Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84761
Return-Path: <cryptocompress@googlemail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 8608 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2015 06:32:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 14 Mar 2015 06:32:17 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cryptocompress@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cryptocompress@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cryptocompress@googlemail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.172 mail-wi0-f172.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.212.172] ([209.85.212.172:37521] helo=mail-wi0-f172.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id A7/81-34457-0F5D3055 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 01:32:17 -0500
Received: by wixw10 with SMTP id w10so3030091wix.0
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 23:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=A1ByVpIWvUUyL8KaefqSgMTluBXoMcrJQvWuw3qMEzk=;
        b=tALdtloBGeVKO3+sRVS20zyzvLRySE/L992lGHQ+ch7rb963NzBd/gB55UKUJVVE8P
         XY+swMdn8RYfIfaM9pKS+l0Hnys2qZiWebdm0OwyLLrj9oomSahg/9Hs9WTEPt2vI8LJ
         FhqJfTsAgslic4ZHuwFNGsMk9mZMafrc3xnKx2OcaLHOTQisasgrKU9AXTe3WGNFNlVg
         yCEORvdvM3C0ZJgwqFXIBsU97JxaPMgWM3G/t7i5QtplbETH1NKSeGeyNb8e0WTeULAs
         LmX2oaPs8sIUVxfzG7V/fdTzNOST86c+1WK4PjQ3XMyhf56jTmcfcjzjaUBZ0B5V/Lwv
         9GBA==
X-Received: by 10.180.198.101 with SMTP id jb5mr141954428wic.92.1426314734208;
        Fri, 13 Mar 2015 23:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.115] (mnch-5d858cf9.pool.mediaWays.net. [93.133.140.249])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dj4sm5735648wjc.13.2015.03.13.23.32.12
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Fri, 13 Mar 2015 23:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5503D5EB.4090502@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 07:32:11 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matteo Beccati <php@beccati.com>
CC: PHP Developers Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <DUB113-W493E3375BEB1D6C28AC8FDF91D0@phx.gbl>,<DUB113-W1272AADCBBD2E84A7A9EB19F9060@phx.gbl>,<CA+kxMuRNRBC_Me0PXDh5+MvWb6yyGqWs_MMFRwpyEEp=FB=CFw@mail.gmail.com> <DUB113-W95830975785BBB76BD2A46F9060@phx.gbl> <550287B1.3080001@googlemail.com> <5502A66A.5030706@beccati.com>
In-Reply-To: <5502A66A.5030706@beccati.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Make empty() a Variadic
From: cryptocompress@googlemail.com (Crypto Compress)

Am 13.03.2015 um 09:57 schrieb Matteo Beccati:
> On 13/03/2015 07:46, Crypto Compress wrote:
>> how about two separate methods all_empty() and non[e]_empty()?
>
> How about empty() and full() ?
> Ok, that was a bad attempt as a joke, but please no ;)

Hello Matteo,

don't get your point. Are you against my naming suggestions or the 
possibility to check many vars on emptiness?
There are these two groups with contrary expectations. What is the 
downside to give both a proper solution?

Thanks!