Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84751 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 67754 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2015 00:12:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Mar 2015 00:12:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 74.125.82.50 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.50 mail-wg0-f50.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.50] ([74.125.82.50:33187] helo=mail-wg0-f50.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 4C/EC-34457-80D73055 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:12:56 -0500 Received: by wgbcc7 with SMTP id cc7so209243wgb.0 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:12:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=gFg/VGyRUMOmvgQTF7EQIOq59wnlCHdmjkL/1IJvPG0=; b=AO10FssRZGdfIZCv+Tq/ntLRFszmo15SB+uDLewtQ5B/X0h59/g+iLFemDJSYYWLpj MUP87hHSqPCZwC4MKw3JEdNMU1KyVwfpWrFrJkEpH+SF5v/XJo43Sx35Y4Ob0PsGPpqL SV+hnuJ6OM9QIJlvC0DGix3i2Kt0/WHrI5g20QHFcSM3eQrIE4X/+nBkrXIXw+Tm1fey rHGS0bJvPW/0yfHZBlt6FjSZ6z9yCKWHeanJQVsIDFnkWYhv02WAdsSkJ0hfj2aGkLO4 BxnQkoQtqQhEv14Cwmbehw6pEUYYvxk9a0D2FOwxONcEJjiZMRFeWauVtBi1jMfXyGog qoIA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk90OxSV/rLTjrWMpymLqjJCVOW0FOTWYsoQj7jm+rzGd9e7DFs/EC8PQjH6Y9pcmSxaP2P1CEq/rkegHQNQ42+nrqMK760MiXcN4fmORD9SvdLNL3vVDfPPKLo9KCwS00CC+hmdhj5re4mk1hbxU66ME03VQ== X-Received: by 10.180.91.79 with SMTP id cc15mr132151695wib.37.1426291973355; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:12:53 -0700 (PDT) References: <325E0097-FD7E-4997-A95D-20C62368E162@zend.com> <55031C54.6060802@eliw.com> <7CE491F0-C243-4788-ADA2-5DA9DF1D1168@php.net> <332304ae552bfc635f999a8d73b505f0@mail.gmail.com> <7de9d64ab85cad86836b43c8acbed439@mail.gmail.com> <1426290732.53996.6284.camel@proposaltech.com> In-Reply-To: <1426290732.53996.6284.camel@proposaltech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQLg0UZIsq+15w5AwD0SDZXLD3VPogLMHcQTAaGt238CcCYc0AGWzLp/ApGYoQUDQRlseQIrE/I/AkSeeDQDMwLjegK3zgrBAiTpF5gC0AkRM5oNeriw Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 02:12:48 +0200 Message-ID: To: Todd Ruth Cc: PHP Internals List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) > This whole thing is depressing. I am confident Zeev means well, but as a > usually silent watcher of this list, I'll give this bystander's view of > the recent > discussion: > "I don't like X, but I'll vote for it unless I can get Y approved." > "I can't get Y approved, but I don't want to vote for X; How about Z?" > I know some people consider Z to be common ground because it is a sort of > intersection of X and Y, but it is clear that is not a consensus. I want to correct one statement in your description. I absolutely HATE 'X', it's not that I don't like it. I think it's really bad. The only reason I will vote for it and encourage others to do the same is for unity. And yes, that's why I would absolutely want to explore any viable alternatives beforehand (these two viable alternatives being Y and Z, there's no 4th one). I also think that while it's clear that there's no consensus behind Z - we have no idea how much support it garners. If it has significantly more than that for X, is it fair we're not giving it a chance? Should we not expect the X supporters to vote in favor for Z for the sake of the very same unity? Zeev