Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84744 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 55286 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2015 23:23:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Mar 2015 23:23:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=bobwei9@hotmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=bobwei9@hotmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain hotmail.com designates 65.55.111.100 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: bobwei9@hotmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 65.55.111.100 blu004-omc2s25.hotmail.com Received: from [65.55.111.100] ([65.55.111.100:65112] helo=BLU004-OMC2S25.hotmail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C0/7A-34457-55173055 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 18:23:01 -0500 Received: from BLU436-SMTP114 ([65.55.111.72]) by BLU004-OMC2S25.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:22:59 -0700 X-TMN: [Z3sQtdZYQQYJa5TEwfHkaky0AM205484] X-Originating-Email: [bobwei9@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3C7CF239-CEA3-497E-838B-82B04B24EA3D" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) In-Reply-To: <7de9d64ab85cad86836b43c8acbed439@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 00:22:53 +0100 CC: PHP Internals List References: <325E0097-FD7E-4997-A95D-20C62368E162@zend.com> <55031C54.6060802@eliw.com> <7CE491F0-C243-4788-ADA2-5DA9DF1D1168@php.net> <332304ae552bfc635f999a8d73b505f0@mail.gmail.com> <7de9d64ab85cad86836b43c8acbed439@mail.gmail.com> To: Zeev Suraski X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Mar 2015 23:22:56.0748 (UTC) FILETIME=[A34E2AC0:01D05DE4] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types From: bobwei9@hotmail.com (Bob Weinand) --Apple-Mail=_3C7CF239-CEA3-497E-838B-82B04B24EA3D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > Am 14.03.2015 um 00:14 schrieb Zeev Suraski : >=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bob Weinand [mailto:bobwei9@hotmail.com] >> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2015 1:07 AM >> To: PHP Internals List >> Cc: Zeev Suraski; guilhermeblanco@gmail.com >> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types >>=20 >> I won't go into vote tomorrow. >>=20 >> Given that we already discussed that proposal a lot a few months ago >> (Andreas v1), we can go for a discussion phase a bit shorter (like 10 = days >> total), but I won't put a new RFC into vote tomorrow. Especially as = it's >> still >> being heavily discussed. >>=20 >> Also, this vote is just valid in case where other votes fail - so we >> actually >> don't *compete* with Anthonys RFC. It doesn't affect the voting = period of >> Anthonys RFC. We can have the vote still going on a few days after = both >> RFCs failed. >> This RFC is only about the common part of both RFCs. >=20 > Bob, >=20 > If you don't put it into a vote by Sunday, then by definition it can't = get > into v7.0 - unless we either have another vote to delay the timeline = (big > hassle). Plus, as you can see, there are people (heck, even me) that = would > vote in favor of the Dual Mode RFC just because there's no = alternative. >=20 > Zeev Zeev, If I put it into vote until Sunday, we're breaking the voting process. = Which required an apt discussion phase which definitely isn't given when = we start Sunday. Also. Your timeline RFC leaves a bit room for interpretation ("Line up" = means? Put into discussion? Vote? Have votes all already accepted?) . If = necessary, I'll rather push timeline a bit than breaking vote process. Thanks, Bob= --Apple-Mail=_3C7CF239-CEA3-497E-838B-82B04B24EA3D--