Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84733 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35500 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2015 22:36:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Mar 2015 22:36:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.54 mail-wg0-f54.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.54] ([74.125.82.54:44591] helo=mail-wg0-f54.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F8/46-34457-16663055 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:36:18 -0500 Received: by wghl18 with SMTP id l18so26161434wgh.11 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:36:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lFxskpXdGw8MiwYPIDRtxoQ0qbHTT8Fihteafoz84KQ=; b=bDsSqqOUVwdIKdRO/iWgwxrqcgP7kRZoHhDyRfxiTICiZ5vRKFSsvplRjVWJKtW+jN gqLlwHWkE9izeofZZRfL0ppskjd5elYrgiih3HrRhJgTIrThAXehCin8sFOWwvfS8YlU 5BXvl/w2rg8ClG/TgGi1+x+Gr/E62kRL9G4xPJU+3dU8vbe7x+h8Gc/JSfA5AYHMjPZ+ 9rnk/DgNok9l2O63h3ZHoxX2cT+HTOLkg+5BbwbjfGfIudC9cKtYx4NT8PzhOXcpQ2ii MKGadHRIINhOq2pdl6cuL2ZfXzzD1+SZX8dkDnSAJ1AcCupllEMht9UEuzMqN4a9UJ87 RV0g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmjkxatrJaUIeiFoRnmeUVIb59l972sIrzqBzB8TYhVdeNxeoBVeQ+8dYREhA3LLDJ5E+BKFSOu84NTS/75uHffWh5bClc2JHj8NkLvfZ+ZxF4kjCSFt9ovCaAxRK1tdGEit11rJ8Ootw22NJL/Q6RcfpMBAw== X-Received: by 10.194.79.226 with SMTP id m2mr100165886wjx.60.1426286171377; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:36:11 -0700 (PDT) References: <325E0097-FD7E-4997-A95D-20C62368E162@zend.com> <55031C54.6060802@eliw.com> <7CE491F0-C243-4788-ADA2-5DA9DF1D1168@php.net> <332304ae552bfc635f999a8d73b505f0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQLg0UZIsq+15w5AwD0SDZXLD3VPogLMHcQTAaGt238CcCYc0AGWzLp/ApGYoQUDQRlseQIrE/I/AkSeeDQBy8bbHwGrcgw7AyT3PPqaL30h0A== Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 00:36:11 +0200 Message-ID: <28730261190f7387128fe3b07e738d06@mail.gmail.com> To: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) Guilherme, The v0.5 RFC vote is NOT ending today, but rather on EOD of the 25th. Anthony put in the text saying that the vote will end no sooner than when the vote for the competing RFC will end, and that's March 25th. I hope we do get a chance to vote on the Basic RFC. Zeev > -----Original Message----- > From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com [mailto:guilhermeblanco@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2015 12:26 AM > To: Stelian Mocanita > Cc: Pierre Joye; Zeev Suraski; PHP internals; Benjamin Eberlei > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types > > And none answered me... is this RFC gonna be allowed to enter on voting > phase for 7.0 or not? > > This drastically changes my voted on STH v5 which ends EOD today. > > []s, > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Stelian Mocanita > wrote: > > > Zeev, allow me to understand how this goes. Bob's discussions on > the RFC > started 2 days ago. Based on the current rules, the RFC can only go > to vote > after 2 weeks. That means in 12 days starting now. > > So we are either violating the RFC rules by pushing the vote > tomorrow or > we're > delaying PHP7 for another 2 weeks maybe yet another TH RFC > passes? > > Pointing at number 6 from https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Pierre Joye > wrote: > > > On Mar 14, 2015 9:03 AM, "Zeev Suraski" > wrote: > > > > > > > > Maybe I was na=C3=AFve, but I thought I had a better way to make bot= h > weak & > > > strict camps happy, > > > > By dropping strict despite all discussions, proposing a pandara box > rfc by > > changing the casting rules and now suddenly proposing to go vote > to yet > > another "perfect" RFC? Sorry, it does not help anyone and damages > php, > > creates yet more issues. This is not a good call. > > > > > > > > -- > > Guilherme Blanco > MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com > GTalk: guilhermeblanco > Toronto - ON/Canada