Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84729 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 30250 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2015 22:26:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Mar 2015 22:26:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.223.172 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.223.172 mail-ie0-f172.google.com Received: from [209.85.223.172] ([209.85.223.172:33357] helo=mail-ie0-f172.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 75/35-34457-32463055 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:26:43 -0500 Received: by iecvj10 with SMTP id vj10so125708264iec.0 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:26:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=apUGN2W3En8BfY+lVgbkQDxf9s6+FZoh5nO/OLf4y5I=; b=KveLdK98uy9WCcLpS+s2OmBHQY1Ni8nAdoM/bQRQ8ICUm/wl3+BCX8dwjpoFlw9Ter eADyfpQTsl90so73M1kCL1Y46HRt+bHRstx+nenRhAcgIXfe0m/NM/YqC8QXMg8/Oczh vWETZeXhbPMiq9vUAKhUF+k5fqCBVgckNUDNKA0EXIC1+5fx3HNCP5OJwDb5d3sGvq7o I3np4dha30cRZuYbbtXu+vGrFH4JhLC4qp4mpCfwA3PRLiZIByT8YLoI3n9LRbftWk0a BJlRCl6NM8O8AvP/iw3LZ5T1JqsbibGwd7yCtwb5jNzFyn1EZTaeZhDXGjlOKRdi3CIP JILg== X-Received: by 10.50.131.196 with SMTP id oo4mr89254821igb.2.1426285600600; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:26:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.49.97 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:26:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <325E0097-FD7E-4997-A95D-20C62368E162@zend.com> <55031C54.6060802@eliw.com> <7CE491F0-C243-4788-ADA2-5DA9DF1D1168@php.net> <332304ae552bfc635f999a8d73b505f0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 18:26:20 -0400 Message-ID: To: Stelian Mocanita Cc: Pierre Joye , Zeev Suraski , PHP internals , Benjamin Eberlei Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b2e14659278bb051132febb Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com ("guilhermeblanco@gmail.com") --047d7b2e14659278bb051132febb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable And none answered me... is this RFC gonna be allowed to enter on voting phase for 7.0 or not? This drastically changes my voted on STH v5 which ends EOD today. []s, On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Stelian Mocanita wrote: > Zeev, allow me to understand how this goes. Bob's discussions on the RFC > started 2 days ago. Based on the current rules, the RFC can only go to vo= te > after 2 weeks. That means in 12 days starting now. > > So we are either violating the RFC rules by pushing the vote tomorrow or > we're > delaying PHP7 for another 2 weeks maybe yet another TH RFC passes? > > Pointing at number 6 from https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Pierre Joye > wrote: > > > On Mar 14, 2015 9:03 AM, "Zeev Suraski" wrote: > > > > > > > > Maybe I was na=C3=AFve, but I thought I had a better way to make both= weak & > > > strict camps happy, > > > > By dropping strict despite all discussions, proposing a pandara box rfc > by > > changing the casting rules and now suddenly proposing to go vote to yet > > another "perfect" RFC? Sorry, it does not help anyone and damages php, > > creates yet more issues. This is not a good call. > > > --=20 Guilherme Blanco MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com GTalk: guilhermeblanco Toronto - ON/Canada --047d7b2e14659278bb051132febb--