Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84727 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 26740 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2015 22:17:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Mar 2015 22:17:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stelian.mocanita@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stelian.mocanita@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.46 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stelian.mocanita@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.46 mail-la0-f46.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.46] ([209.85.215.46:34579] helo=mail-la0-f46.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C8/84-34457-FF163055 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:17:35 -0500 Received: by lagg8 with SMTP id g8so218741lag.1 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:17:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Bo1fhCUYcKgVhkNUG0weWpQjDo00CjQ2Vea8fc4f5pg=; b=h2y4erWy06r7D5fJhypA3BeyfPM0oiOMy2j+g3JNfFZ9KTk5peRtb7ViR3nluvuqgz 2SkHXU6H6lMuCjgK1z+hZx2GVpF3viVQUrM+DtPSquoQnwm3XFCADPglJwM6m/awOoeS V87/gK5ILXT/iIZMtH9GmgBYrByzWtGWYQ3535MDOL5BSakNWJrRsmlgKVofifqxuc/R wv5vcRIuzgQyYt5bN8EPBgb1n0+dWlpQZpEJxe7p2ZQQGxpm5yUUybutz15onWXvSeos BPu3EH6FqqTsiK98Bz7Zr5ua/mJwTdGO0AR4fbxBfaaGEF5Bf+yc5sz7e72+l1kTkFjN T+mA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.22.67 with SMTP id b3mr44301891laf.117.1426285052270; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:17:32 -0700 (PDT) Sender: stelian.mocanita@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.217.11 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:17:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <325E0097-FD7E-4997-A95D-20C62368E162@zend.com> <55031C54.6060802@eliw.com> <7CE491F0-C243-4788-ADA2-5DA9DF1D1168@php.net> <332304ae552bfc635f999a8d73b505f0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 23:17:32 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: VforF62E94QhVMehf4RhluenENU Message-ID: To: Pierre Joye Cc: Zeev Suraski , PHP internals , Benjamin Eberlei Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158b86ee3a282051132dd0b Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types From: stelianm@php.net (Stelian Mocanita) --089e0158b86ee3a282051132dd0b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Zeev, allow me to understand how this goes. Bob's discussions on the RFC started 2 days ago. Based on the current rules, the RFC can only go to vote after 2 weeks. That means in 12 days starting now. So we are either violating the RFC rules by pushing the vote tomorrow or we're delaying PHP7 for another 2 weeks maybe yet another TH RFC passes? Pointing at number 6 from https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Mar 14, 2015 9:03 AM, "Zeev Suraski" wrote: > > > > > Maybe I was na=C3=AFve, but I thought I had a better way to make both w= eak & > > strict camps happy, > > By dropping strict despite all discussions, proposing a pandara box rfc b= y > changing the casting rules and now suddenly proposing to go vote to yet > another "perfect" RFC? Sorry, it does not help anyone and damages php, > creates yet more issues. This is not a good call. > --089e0158b86ee3a282051132dd0b--