Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84724
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.212.180 as permitted sender)
References: <BLU436-SMTP234CAFED9639237DE430B18E2190@phx.gbl>
	<325E0097-FD7E-4997-A95D-20C62368E162@zend.com>	<55031C54.6060802@eliw.com>
	<CAMc0WS5MJ_RAtNO47R4wQjy8_YSDzzZeGECLUnzSVOAmB2JyPw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFp73Xtk4-o=DjipY4niopmgg+JC+Yyju_oxUWKWEHqMgQoiOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<7CE491F0-C243-4788-ADA2-5DA9DF1D1168@php.net>	<d40df0c5636fccd2dd672ad1a4b72ced@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABDNdAHk=TaV=AhjjSgBbqjEu27cQe3H4LZM+cy_Kg15xMUrRQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABDNdAHk=TaV=AhjjSgBbqjEu27cQe3H4LZM+cy_Kg15xMUrRQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Thread-Index: AQLg0UZIsq+15w5AwD0SDZXLD3VPogLMHcQTAaGt238CcCYc0AGWzLp/ApGYoQUDQRlseQIWQX7imnceO7A=
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 23:55:14 +0200
Message-ID: <1a6dfa50beb1b55b5dc2a313a8c2d86f@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philip Sturgeon <pjsturgeon@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types
From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philip Sturgeon [mailto:pjsturgeon@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 11:16 PM
> To: Zeev Suraski
> Cc: Derick Rethans; Eli; guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; Stelian Mocanita; PHP
> Internals List
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types
>
> But seriously Zeev, I read this as "lets do literally anything we can,
> regardless
> of rules and process to avoid having the RFC that is currently winning
> actually
> pass.
>
> I don't want to assume this is a sneaky, underhand tactic, but it sure
> does
> look quite like it.

Philip, Marcio,

You both raised the same issue so here's a combined answer.  We can go to a
vote on Bob's RFC tomorrow, as it's practically identical to Andrea's v0.1
RFC.  No need to prolong any timelines.

Philip, given I said that if I see no alternative RFC passing I'll change my
vote on the Dual Mode from no to yes, I'd appreciate if you stopped (very
strongly) implying there's anything sneaky or underhand about it.  I will do
my best to get the Dual Mode RFC to pass, but not before I do my best to get
alternatives to it pass - because I think it's bad for PHP.  Let's stop the
personal attacks, please.

Zeev