Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84722
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.42 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEPJdukMnxn+Rjxy7tN0oSfoD_ryNwKDRLjJF6AAwGoWGH8WQA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BLU436-SMTP234CAFED9639237DE430B18E2190@phx.gbl>
	<325E0097-FD7E-4997-A95D-20C62368E162@zend.com>
	<55031C54.6060802@eliw.com>
	<CAMc0WS5MJ_RAtNO47R4wQjy8_YSDzzZeGECLUnzSVOAmB2JyPw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFp73Xtk4-o=DjipY4niopmgg+JC+Yyju_oxUWKWEHqMgQoiOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<7CE491F0-C243-4788-ADA2-5DA9DF1D1168@php.net>
	<d40df0c5636fccd2dd672ad1a4b72ced@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEPJdukMnxn+Rjxy7tN0oSfoD_ryNwKDRLjJF6AAwGoWGH8WQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 08:36:56 +1100
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU6CsMwQviTtMwQ9Tdeo+x9S8G=wwn_ie_8553ysTt9r_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Eberlei <kontakt@beberlei.de>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>, Eli White <eli@eliw.com>, 
	Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>, Stelian Mocanita <stelianm@php.net>, 
	Guilherme Blanco <guilhermeblanco@gmail.com>, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11339844d1449a0511324c3a
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

--001a11339844d1449a0511324c3a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Mar 14, 2015 7:50 AM, "Benjamin Eberlei" <kontakt@beberlei.de> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Derick Rethans [mailto:derick@php.net]
> > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 10:34 PM
> > > To: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; Stelian Mocanita
> > > Cc: Eli; PHP Internals List
> > > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types
> > >
> > >Chance of this RFC passing is going to be slim, as it only caters for
one
> > >of the
> > > three groups that Antony described...
> > >
> > > I certainly will vote against it.
> >
> > You may very well be right, but the only way of truly knowing would be
> > putting it up for a vote.  I'd feel a lot more comfortable if this was
also
> > available for a vote before moving my nay to yay on the Dual Mode RFC.
> >
>
> I don't get it.
>
> you called Andrea out for not putting up v1 of her RFC for vote because it
> had so much momentum behind it.
> Instead of just doing what bwoebi did you put up another RFC that got
*much
> more* negative tone from the beginning.
> We agree on having a vote on two RFCs, coercive and v5.
> Now that coercive is the clear loser suddenly v1 must be up for vote as
> well?

I totally agree with your comment, it looks a bit like a desperate move or
attempt to block or counter the other one.

We should really stop that...

> You had the chance to do just this.

>
> > Zeev
> >
> > --
> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
> >

--001a11339844d1449a0511324c3a--