Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84721
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d40df0c5636fccd2dd672ad1a4b72ced@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BLU436-SMTP234CAFED9639237DE430B18E2190@phx.gbl>
	<325E0097-FD7E-4997-A95D-20C62368E162@zend.com>
	<55031C54.6060802@eliw.com>
	<CAMc0WS5MJ_RAtNO47R4wQjy8_YSDzzZeGECLUnzSVOAmB2JyPw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFp73Xtk4-o=DjipY4niopmgg+JC+Yyju_oxUWKWEHqMgQoiOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<7CE491F0-C243-4788-ADA2-5DA9DF1D1168@php.net>
	<d40df0c5636fccd2dd672ad1a4b72ced@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:16:25 -0400
Message-ID: <CABDNdAHk=TaV=AhjjSgBbqjEu27cQe3H4LZM+cy_Kg15xMUrRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
Cc: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>, Eli <eli@eliw.com>, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com, 
	Stelian Mocanita <stelianm@php.net>, PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types
From: pjsturgeon@gmail.com (Philip Sturgeon)

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Derick Rethans [mailto:derick@php.net]
>> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 10:34 PM
>> To: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; Stelian Mocanita
>> Cc: Eli; PHP Internals List
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types
>>
>>Chance of this RFC passing is going to be slim, as it only caters for one
>>of the
>> three groups that Antony described...
>>
>> I certainly will vote against it.
>
> You may very well be right, but the only way of truly knowing would be
> putting it up for a vote.  I'd feel a lot more comfortable if this was also
> available for a vote before moving my nay to yay on the Dual Mode RFC.
>
> Zeev
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>

Votes for you. Votes for you. Votes for everyone!

Get Oprah in here.

But seriously Zeev, I read this as "lets do literally anything we can,
regardless of rules and process to avoid having the RFC that is
currently winning actually pass.

I don't want to assume this is a sneaky, underhand tactic, but it sure
does look quite like it.