Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84717
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain beberlei.de from 209.85.212.182 cause and error)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d40df0c5636fccd2dd672ad1a4b72ced@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BLU436-SMTP234CAFED9639237DE430B18E2190@phx.gbl>
	<325E0097-FD7E-4997-A95D-20C62368E162@zend.com>
	<55031C54.6060802@eliw.com>
	<CAMc0WS5MJ_RAtNO47R4wQjy8_YSDzzZeGECLUnzSVOAmB2JyPw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFp73Xtk4-o=DjipY4niopmgg+JC+Yyju_oxUWKWEHqMgQoiOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<7CE491F0-C243-4788-ADA2-5DA9DF1D1168@php.net>
	<d40df0c5636fccd2dd672ad1a4b72ced@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 21:50:14 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEPJdukMnxn+Rjxy7tN0oSfoD_ryNwKDRLjJF6AAwGoWGH8WQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
Cc: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>, Eli <eli@eliw.com>, 
	Guilherme Blanco <guilhermeblanco@gmail.com>, Stelian Mocanita <stelianm@php.net>, 
	PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf0c538b77c97051131a573
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types
From: kontakt@beberlei.de (Benjamin Eberlei)

--047d7bf0c538b77c97051131a573
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Derick Rethans [mailto:derick@php.net]
> > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 10:34 PM
> > To: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; Stelian Mocanita
> > Cc: Eli; PHP Internals List
> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types
> >
> >Chance of this RFC passing is going to be slim, as it only caters for one
> >of the
> > three groups that Antony described...
> >
> > I certainly will vote against it.
>
> You may very well be right, but the only way of truly knowing would be
> putting it up for a vote.  I'd feel a lot more comfortable if this was also
> available for a vote before moving my nay to yay on the Dual Mode RFC.
>

I don't get it.

you called Andrea out for not putting up v1 of her RFC for vote because it
had so much momentum behind it.
Instead of just doing what bwoebi did you put up another RFC that got *much
more* negative tone from the beginning.
We agree on having a vote on two RFCs, coercive and v5.
Now that coercive is the clear loser suddenly v1 must be up for vote as
well?

You had the chance to do just this.


> Zeev
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

--047d7bf0c538b77c97051131a573--