Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84716 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 5850 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2015 20:44:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Mar 2015 20:44:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 74.125.82.179 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.179 mail-we0-f179.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.179] ([74.125.82.179:35677] helo=mail-we0-f179.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 10/C0-34457-E1C43055 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:44:15 -0500 Received: by wesw55 with SMTP id w55so25767737wes.2 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 13:44:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=cvQzAMr4YbUQ5kel5mguZR1QE6Ak7L4Aj57et6g2988=; b=TVgSr4TZCBLxfZ6JGK5J/gdvMdOMZ2lENEqaOKfghDtzRvDAPgXZCV8DWEI6jArD2f j4WSpKJaNKDuGxsO5nrRImrF7Mkx4QNb0rPbgXMSFkKZNxjHShKE5xNFwVJj12e+jlVC Qv4dZTQZwG+EhmGiO84GkOykOYqNruaz1Adqtllxm6Wj4AThl3/dLG+3cSy/Dm4bINJu NmnAuf9VApVhd8ohmYtN7CmGdhyM+5EwWShtTFJqzrjt+naJ4lObxKDCzUUqHRHwGbru Z1EnCCVv5d8e3fYjOaIkc4IfJ/gMj43ka4VQ77wUjlyLtpfdc1eC/oddXD3Ank07Cs9R snxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkQs73JwBf7xilEqZGLdPlKwMAnueD/4M1XzT2jWlPCCaeIvOm52wGywYpVYMuMiBMeGflTuoLlPIMxwvz6RJ0nIeUQSYSPRR2FvRkVrZO0a/vew92evfkikqljg3ZybqWH46qVEQWq6AsXEUOENGE4TR7Z0A== X-Received: by 10.180.149.206 with SMTP id uc14mr143475123wib.57.1426279451839; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 13:44:11 -0700 (PDT) References: <325E0097-FD7E-4997-A95D-20C62368E162@zend.com> <55031C54.6060802@eliw.com> <7CE491F0-C243-4788-ADA2-5DA9DF1D1168@php.net> In-Reply-To: <7CE491F0-C243-4788-ADA2-5DA9DF1D1168@php.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQLg0UZIsq+15w5AwD0SDZXLD3VPogLMHcQTAaGt238CcCYc0AGWzLp/ApGYoQWaocaM8A== Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:44:10 +0200 Message-ID: To: Derick Rethans Cc: Eli , guilhermeblanco@gmail.com, Stelian Mocanita , PHP Internals List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) > -----Original Message----- > From: Derick Rethans [mailto:derick@php.net] > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 10:34 PM > To: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; Stelian Mocanita > Cc: Eli; PHP Internals List > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types > >Chance of this RFC passing is going to be slim, as it only caters for one >of the > three groups that Antony described... > > I certainly will vote against it. You may very well be right, but the only way of truly knowing would be putting it up for a vote. I'd feel a lot more comfortable if this was also available for a vote before moving my nay to yay on the Dual Mode RFC. Zeev