Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84707 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85983 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2015 18:39:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Mar 2015 18:39:27 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 77.170.89.239 ip4daa59ef.direct-adsl.nl Received: from [77.170.89.239] ([77.170.89.239:14061] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CE/BF-32208-EDE23055 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 13:39:26 -0500 To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:39:22 +0100 Message-ID: References: <2A.9D.32208.FA623055@pb1.pair.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 77.170.89.239 Subject: Re: A plea for unity on scalar types From: phpdev@ehrhardt.nl (Jan Ehrhardt) Maciej Sobaczewski in php.internals (Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:04:30 +0100): >I think (and I do really hope) that some of those 33 votes came from >misunderstanding of the proposal. Maybe. But on the other hand there are some names in the v0.5 no-camp, that you would want to be on the yes side in such a controversial issue: dmitry, xinchen, mike, rasmus, stas and zeev, to name some. There seems to be a big divide between those and the 65-67% in the yes-camp at the moment. If Zeev retracts the Coercive RFC at the moment both proposals may fail. Anthony's plea for unity is right on target. No one would benefit from a divided community. Jan BTW: ajf's vote is still missing in the v0.5 RFC !?