Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84666
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.182 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <325E0097-FD7E-4997-A95D-20C62368E162@zend.com>
References: <BLU436-SMTP234CAFED9639237DE430B18E2190@phx.gbl> <325E0097-FD7E-4997-A95D-20C62368E162@zend.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:08:13 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXar-PQdcy7yzA57jXp64pP9Q3N0qM5t09PCMm5_02-wUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com>
Cc: Bob Weinand <bobwei9@hotmail.com>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01176fe1e9b6e905112702dd
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

--089e01176fe1e9b6e905112702dd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi all,

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com> wrote:

> > On Mar 11, 2015, at 2:28 PM, Bob Weinand <bobwei9@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > after all, some people are not happy with the current proposals about
> scalar types. So, they both still possibly may fail.
> >
> > Thus, I'd like to come up with a fallback proposal in case both
> proposals fail:
> >
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/basic_scalar_types
> >
> > It shouldn't prevent any future improvements and still give use all the
> advantages of scalar types.
>
> Agree and I would vote +1 on this even if I'd prefer coercive.
> It is a very valid option for a 7.0 and it is future proof.


The same opinion.
I prefer coercive, but it's good enough for now.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net

--089e01176fe1e9b6e905112702dd--