Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84662
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.192.175 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <BLU436-SMTP234CAFED9639237DE430B18E2190@phx.gbl>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 22:17:16 -0700
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <325E0097-FD7E-4997-A95D-20C62368E162@zend.com>
References: <BLU436-SMTP234CAFED9639237DE430B18E2190@phx.gbl>
To: Bob Weinand <bobwei9@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types
From: andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans)


> On Mar 11, 2015, at 2:28 PM, Bob Weinand <bobwei9@hotmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Hi all,
>=20
> after all, some people are not happy with the current proposals about scal=
ar types. So, they both still possibly may fail.
>=20
> Thus, I'd like to come up with a fallback proposal in case both proposals f=
ail:
>=20
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/basic_scalar_types
>=20
> It shouldn't prevent any future improvements and still give use all the ad=
vantages of scalar types.

Agree and I would vote +1 on this even if I'd prefer coercive.=20
It is a very valid option for a 7.0 and it is future proof.=20

>=20
> Thanks,
> Bob
> --=20
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>=20