Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84643 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93337 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2015 16:36:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Mar 2015 16:36:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@bof.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@bof.de; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain bof.de designates 80.242.145.70 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@bof.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.242.145.70 mars.intermailgate.com Received: from [80.242.145.70] ([80.242.145.70:39628] helo=mars.intermailgate.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F8/70-24603-A90C1055 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:36:43 -0500 Received: (qmail 5178 invoked by uid 1009); 12 Mar 2015 17:36:39 +0100 Received: from 209.85.192.50 by mars (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.96.2/20182. spamassassin: 3.3.1. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:1(209.85.192.50):. Processed in 0.262245 secs); 12 Mar 2015 16:36:39 -0000 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: php@bof.de via mars X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:1(209.85.192.50):. Processed in 0.262245 secs Process 5160) Received: from mail-qg0-f50.google.com (gmail@bof.de@209.85.192.50) by mars.intermailgate.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 12 Mar 2015 17:36:39 +0100 Received: by qgdz60 with SMTP id z60so19476595qgd.1 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:36:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.19.82 with SMTP id 76mr53339322qgg.19.1426178197556; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:36:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.82.198 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:36:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.82.198 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:36:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5501BE92.5020407@garfieldtech.com> References: <6D.2C.32765.10EC0055@pb1.pair.com> <5500D967.5040800@gmail.com> <13.69.64353.73451055@pb1.pair.com> <5501876C.3020107@gmail.com> <3D.85.42021.3E7A1055@pb1.pair.com> <5501B77D.5010800@gmail.com> <5501BE92.5020407@garfieldtech.com> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:36:37 +0100 Message-ID: To: Larry Garfield Cc: internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134edbeda16ff051119fc36 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] static constructor From: php@bof.de (Patrick Schaaf) --001a1134edbeda16ff051119fc36 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Am 12.03.2015 17:28 schrieb "Larry Garfield" : > > I thought it sounded familiar. Also check the list archive for "A modest proposal: __constructStatic" from a month ago. It was rejected then, too. That proposal was about a completely different issue. But you are right, it was dismissed using the same "I don't like static, use objects" nonargument. best regards Patrick --001a1134edbeda16ff051119fc36--