Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84610 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 174 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2015 04:50:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Mar 2015 04:50:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=vchkpw@developersdesk.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=vchkpw@developersdesk.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain developersdesk.com designates 204.228.229.4 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: vchkpw@developersdesk.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 204.228.229.4 lessa.developersdesk.com Received: from [204.228.229.4] ([204.228.229.4:59952] helo=mail.developersdesk.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 90/86-64353-D2B11055 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:50:55 -0500 Received: (qmail 15015 invoked by uid 89); 12 Mar 2015 04:50:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.151?) (vchkpw@developersdesk.com@96.19.163.170) by 0 with ESMTPA; 12 Mar 2015 04:50:50 -0000 Message-ID: <55011B23.3080801@developersdesk.com> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 22:50:43 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <54F83C4D.1020206@gmail.com> <54F8BF67.6080600@gmail.com> <848D3C19-DE29-4E5F-9B23-D87D3F4A9365@gmail.com> <54FB45D6.3040803@gmail.com> <54FCD063.4040300@gmail.com> <54FEB910.5000608@lsces.co.uk> <54FF5E39.7000507@lsces.co.uk> <550035F0.10703@gmail.com> <5500F527.1030606@lsces.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <5500F527.1030606@lsces.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Consistent function names From: vchkpw@developersdesk.com (Rick Widmer) On 3/11/2015 8:08 PM, Lester Caine wrote: > > Personally I just want to keep the current name set and so the sheer > volume of changes proposed is a big kick in the face to me. YES! The time to make such a change to the names is about 1998 or maybe 2000. Every person who learns the current names is one more reason not to change them now!