Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84586 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 23975 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2015 22:02:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Mar 2015 22:02:34 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 91.115.245.126 91-115-245-126.adsl.highway.telekom.at Received: from [91.115.245.126] ([91.115.245.126:29598] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F4/C4-32765-97BB0055 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 17:02:33 -0500 Message-ID: To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:02:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 91.115.245.126 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types From: mail@deroetzi.de (Johannes Ott) Am 11.03.2015 um 22:28 schrieb Bob Weinand: > Hi all, > > after all, some people are not happy with the current proposals about scalar types. So, they both still possibly may fail. > > Thus, I'd like to come up with a fallback proposal in case both proposals fail: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/basic_scalar_types > > It shouldn't prevent any future improvements and still give use all the advantages of scalar types. > > Thanks, > Bob > From me although a +1 vote. -- DerOetzi