Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84572
Return-Path: <leight@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 95065 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2015 19:07:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 11 Mar 2015 19:07:52 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=leight@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=leight@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: leight@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.175 mail-vc0-f175.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.220.175] ([209.85.220.175:55998] helo=mail-vc0-f175.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 58/40-07702-78290055 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:07:52 -0500
Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hq11so3775462vcb.6
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=2WIViaJksjFaaXqHL4aQU8qzqAbFrMmigabwcqPovFo=;
        b=iX9Jj3Ma38bszuawfPDZR9WbP9M7BQJQiZ5yUB7Ypz1ZKs4Y1cp95MlbIxN+9tLSe6
         8w2y2ND4qovQYhT6dFpqf2ahV6mtOiI31Cg4zYCyRsj4uZFIa75XBARFGAa0mHrCGXc+
         RevhmAwXj3OmsECgCj5NhPSzACckxqLUkRL827AExR0HYpv6fHhebbo3JyHHTrQ8bSzi
         AE4KK9TPdDythz+M5sdIM7r3oPTcyjZJgbiGax/A6+25NOarAoKK/AZ1prM5Alz0JXBr
         A0RcAinr1RtPU1iVjsGuKUZpV+e+pWS8CQLxm9COrupj14VszDzVMDczcDgCbxnYGpSn
         BsqQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.52.136 with SMTP id t8mr44679706vdo.49.1426100869409;
 Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.177.7 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55008D73.8010701@eliw.com>
References: <ff8e8d5564b00b7baead3d9dd46282c8@mail.gmail.com>
	<C0.EE.07702.B6B80055@pb1.pair.com>
	<55008D73.8010701@eliw.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:07:49 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPwsocFBfXsU9ta=usmQwPkr0jEo+sq9TaaRy5baGGmJ4GxoCA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eli <eli@eliw.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE][RFC] Coercive Scalar Type Hints
From: leight@gmail.com (Leigh)

On 11 March 2015 at 18:46, Eli <eli@eliw.com> wrote:
> Benoit ... actually Anthony's original proposal specifically was
> designed to be live at the same time as this alternative proposal.  And
> it's even mentioned in the proposal (stating that it would stay open
> until the 13th or when the alternative proposal voting ended - whichever
> was later)
>
> So this was all 'as planned' there,
> Eli

Not sure "designed to be live at the same time" is entirely correct.
It's more of an honour clause to be invoked in the event of
unfortunate circumstances. (With the less honourable option being to
lock in all of the votes and declaring ergo sum victor)