Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84569 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89875 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2015 18:46:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Mar 2015 18:46:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=eli@eliw.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=eli@eliw.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain eliw.com designates 69.195.198.246 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: eli@eliw.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 69.195.198.246 mx-mia-1.servergrove.com Received: from [69.195.198.246] ([69.195.198.246:39918] helo=mx-mia-1.servergrove.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 98/3F-07702-18D80055 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:46:25 -0500 Received: from [69.195.222.232] (helo=smtp1.servergrove.com) by mx-mia-1.servergrove.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1YVleA-0008MM-El for internals@lists.php.net; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:46:22 +0000 Received: from [69.136.226.104] (port=58843 helo=crossbow.local) by smtp1.servergrove.com with esmtpsa (UNKNOWN:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YVleA-0005tx-Av; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:46:22 +0000 Message-ID: <55008D73.8010701@eliw.com> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:46:11 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dUdoN3qNRa1K0S1TuF2RENUViDblo77Qg" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE][RFC] Coercive Scalar Type Hints From: eli@eliw.com (Eli) --dUdoN3qNRa1K0S1TuF2RENUViDblo77Qg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Benoit ... actually Anthony's original proposal specifically was designed to be live at the same time as this alternative proposal. And it's even mentioned in the proposal (stating that it would stay open until the 13th or when the alternative proposal voting ended - whichever was later) So this was all 'as planned' there, Eli On 3/11/15 2:37 PM, Benoit Schildnecht wrote: > Hi, > > You are making a very huge mistake, IMHO. By having 2 conflicting RFC, > you are taking the risk they both fail. And it won't do any good to the= > language. > > While you could have either proposed yours after the STH one if it > would have failed, or create a new RFC to make the STH one evolve > if it would have succeeded, you decided to act with precipitation. > Why did you do this ? > > I'm kinda sad, upset and anxious. > > Regards, > > > "Zeev Suraski" a =C3=A9crit dans le message de groupe de discussion : >> The vote on the Coercive Scalar Type Hints is now open for voting. > >> The latest version of the RFC includes changes discussed on >> internals@ last > week: > >> 1. Accept string->bool and int->bool conversions (false->bool is not > supported) > >> 2. Accept leading/trailing spaces in string->number conversions. > > > > wiki.php.net/rfc/coercive_sth > > wiki.php.net/rfc/coercive_sth#vote > > > > Thanks! > > > > Zeev > --=20 | Eli White | http://eliw.com/ | Twitter: EliW | --dUdoN3qNRa1K0S1TuF2RENUViDblo77Qg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUAjXQACgkQUTBVzmoxCKLqtwCfYT+TEvwZjbuIzoGHjxh3s02r wfoAnRQUcqH6lNX2mwa7Ye7UYtuJTHqC =cFFi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dUdoN3qNRa1K0S1TuF2RENUViDblo77Qg--