Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84527
Return-Path: <mike.php.net@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 89935 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2015 08:01:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 11 Mar 2015 08:01:57 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mike.php.net@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mike.php.net@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mike.php.net@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.43 mail-wg0-f43.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.82.43] ([74.125.82.43:42721] helo=mail-wg0-f43.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 0E/E0-17169-276FFF45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 03:01:55 -0500
Received: by wggy19 with SMTP id y19so7242323wgg.9
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 01:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
        bh=xkS4/BHNlgQqNuyolAuSACxBVgETbY9ceaJnN++ejOg=;
        b=ntk8qtAL1ALBvRhDfMyKhQsDVg73eXqik7PwtIo6LHVUt2KTzKTCT9d/ICp8PHg78Y
         gceLn/Dk+Sy2gP3pFYdIxnv+qjy6/8F/ODq3eTtJlZCKaXEHvgRGC+VpoXwqIqRKt0KJ
         Ui/pdKXUj+Nt/rsWoADFBtXjx4WM2eBxSMPQvL1sNxR4NDSUXLEEPUEn8osDOjTX/NWU
         +OrtRclIOoK2oI6GBpCYhw3VyqU3ySgTVVnYs4fpOuG2M13iZYsZ2bFpD2xmwTyH2BXC
         GgmQJ4ylpgrincuZ++XO0uYbUkk0xFppqY5T6I2N3Pz8JK7TfBUaYdU7A4Yd0jO0Wv9R
         yTbQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.2.145 with SMTP id 17mr5710509wju.79.1426060912132;
        Wed, 11 Mar 2015 01:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lepisma.bemi (89-104-28-113.customer.bnet.at. [89.104.28.113])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dm6sm4915651wib.22.2015.03.11.01.01.50
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Wed, 11 Mar 2015 01:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Michael Wallner <mike.php.net@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
In-Reply-To: <54FFEE12.6020808@beccati.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:01:50 +0100
Cc: Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>,
 PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <D64698B6-E6B1-430A-978C-D55E4C66EE23@php.net>
References: <0F60F97C-6FAE-45C2-802C-A7A1E49DF40E@php.net> <CAGa2bXbBJwknPVJrpBVQGg-vk+pbDjGN34T7N0kinVpNQXrHEA@mail.gmail.com> <54FFEE12.6020808@beccati.com>
To: Matteo Beccati <php@beccati.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC] continue output buffering
From: mike@php.net (Michael Wallner)

Hi all!

> On 11 03 2015, at 08:26, Matteo Beccati <php@beccati.com> wrote:
>=20
> On 10/03/2015 03:10, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>=20
>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> wrote:
>>=20
>>> Hi, I=E2=80=99d like to start vote on RFC:continue_ob =E2=80=94 any =
objections?
>>>=20
>>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/continue_ob =
<https://wiki.php.net/rfc/continue_ob
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>=20
>> +1
>> I don't mind at all even if you fix this as simple bug fix :)
>=20
> I would agree with Yasuo. It seems like a bug fix to me: maybe a RFC =
is not necessary.

To me, too. But it looked controversial enough to start an RFC instead =
of a commit war.
I think the behaviour pre-5.4 was weird and post-5.4 just of limited =
use, to say the least.

Regards,
Mike