Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84516 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35414 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2015 18:36:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Mar 2015 18:36:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=larry@garfieldtech.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=larry@garfieldtech.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain garfieldtech.com from 66.111.4.26 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: larry@garfieldtech.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 66.111.4.26 out2-smtp.messagingengine.com Received: from [66.111.4.26] ([66.111.4.26:43872] helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 49/B9-08808-8C93FF45 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:36:56 -0500 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC39209C5 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:36:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:36:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=x-sasl-enc:message-id:date:from :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=XfgLPYikxqbsTCAzidkJXQ RhaTE=; b=ozVqcN+oiarSyMqwihnfCbwIs+AoVb6R2f+moEPPYwwBYWKzPDlCgn kblMLPtdeNDZYyNYf2Q9Na0RhW+7diRTx5vG9CqIEIpoJt/gm1H1bVxVw+PVG5QZ lHRqUNPQ/A50Elxvcb5/YL+KS3/GUQeH3qfCRpTA45c47UC1GCEBo= X-Sasl-enc: aeZHz2TKFSgOyGyohjOoNppbgJ9U+8RTOa7GtFVQUcYo 1426012614 Received: from Palantirs-MacBook-Pro-7.local (unknown [63.250.249.138]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 03378C0028C for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:36:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <54FF39C5.3040500@garfieldtech.com> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:36:53 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Voting choice for language changes (Was: "Re: [PHP-DEV][RFC][DISCUSSION] Strict Argument Count") From: larry@garfieldtech.com (Larry Garfield) On 3/10/15 1:29 PM, Marcio Almada wrote: > I think we should do some effort to discuss and discard as much options as > possible so we can have max 2 options or maybe eliminate the secondary > voting at all (which is the perfect scenario IMMO), but this requires a > good absolute number of opinions. If for some reason more than a binary question is necessary, at least go for instant-runoff style voting as that can represent "if not X, then Y is at least tolerable" better than any mechanism currently in use in Internals. --Larry Garfield