Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84515
Return-Path: <pencap@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 32831 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2015 18:30:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 10 Mar 2015 18:30:20 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pencap@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pencap@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.223.169 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pencap@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.223.169 mail-ie0-f169.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.223.169] ([209.85.223.169:35259] helo=mail-ie0-f169.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id FB/19-08808-1383FF45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:30:12 -0500
Received: by iecsf10 with SMTP id sf10so24748677iec.2
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=vaR4Nl6TOY1Er5yPZ7F6r8TUpZgyL8EcZyj8vUBptPA=;
        b=BY2FWv3XFAMKv8fFDIP8kZrM45iIUlPG35e4gPQC6CvQUFlRYwNa6cWDUul0ZsLpS4
         xbWmUO1N0+JYLhmdHoOYoMh+fEk6+M6IM4HORCwWOT0Ad/lrjuxDARmfrKol91RCiiP0
         INuChZt+f5w83qR1iZNi4m3m3NcR9DaLWs9LtNjUDtpoLRaDRd7njaY0bA18aKBPLwzd
         tWRitU3w45Bb6umug5hwu15QuxB4As26OjtyciiZAxtE6NBkg5Sw2vTix0mn8NfQTrf0
         b4zb9K4gXoJHKl6SL7weIe2Y40UoITzKISRFMS2CK0SyRcI5cTgXGNzhC++Mb3WUay8V
         ALXA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.36.104 with SMTP id p8mr59345396igj.16.1426012202153;
 Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.110.194 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0F60F97C-6FAE-45C2-802C-A7A1E49DF40E@php.net>
References: <0F60F97C-6FAE-45C2-802C-A7A1E49DF40E@php.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:30:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CALrkBjY-NgDLL-EZzZDYuqPN8BJ+Yx1Q=QmxmCkv0iE0NARWWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Wallner <mike@php.net>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01182faac1432d0510f356e3
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC] continue output buffering
From: pencap@gmail.com (Mike Willbanks)

--089e01182faac1432d0510f356e3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Mike,

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> wrote:

> Hi, I=E2=80=99d like to start vote on RFC:continue_ob =E2=80=94 any objec=
tions?
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/continue_ob <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/continue_o=
b
> >
>
>
I think it would be good to put an example of why this is immensely useful
in the RFC.  Conditions such as when a user aborts but there is a
transactional situation where the output is necessary of publishing
elsewhere.

But yes, this is a huge +1.

--089e01182faac1432d0510f356e3--