Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84503 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 2794 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2015 14:39:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Mar 2015 14:39:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=patrick.allaert@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=patrickallaert@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.169 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: patrick.allaert@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.169 mail-wi0-f169.google.com Received: from [209.85.212.169] ([209.85.212.169:45184] helo=mail-wi0-f169.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id FC/A3-08808-0120FF45 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 09:39:13 -0500 Received: by wibbs8 with SMTP id bs8so3553585wib.4 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:39:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=e6rvohrpz2oa49zD4IYdD7RRo7RKez0uRnul4l2QDgE=; b=PXFOmbpqhBWaYPMoB0rsbkUbzjxVsbhnkA9fe/6TGKFP12NEJvVd6xs8gWN8r4zB7v vq42bBQJ2LfbMKCavUh0Fb+fQzweuU5MytujH87sZ/O9SP3aqGIMQhfnxINgK3BWON10 8bxUI8IKttlU9vkAwMnge1VgZcVseWgb6EXs4oJiqD6eInrrubOvy23EPP4G2jFvECNG 6AyDtzrkLSyzG0FoLnSz86hPq9/5nHhuz1MtMkpTVyhBOOqjHXLR2m7T+zNczgera7Sy UH5pC2cmRuAB63rlFsP2nJ0256phwUddIDOglgvQdPXBeaif4cE1r2tMca5Gs9AktyUt gKmA== X-Received: by 10.181.13.42 with SMTP id ev10mr70529180wid.69.1425998349912; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:39:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:39:09 +0000 Message-ID: To: marcio3w@gmail.com, Yasuo Ohgaki Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04388df118d1220510f01d94 Subject: Voting choice for language changes (Was: "Re: [PHP-DEV][RFC][DISCUSSION] Strict Argument Count") From: patrickallaert@php.net (Patrick ALLAERT) --f46d04388df118d1220510f01d94 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Le ven. 6 mars 2015 =C3=A0 00:44, Marcio Almada a = =C3=A9crit : > > You are right about this. I'll setup a yes/no vote + a vote to decide > between E_WARNING (for consistency), E_DEPRECATED or E_STRICT. For me thi= s > is just a detail but maybe it's very important to others, so better to le= t > each voter decide upon it. > In case of language changes, shouldn't the 2/3 of majority be required at any levels? In situations like: Main feature: No/Yes Option: A, B or C My gut feeling is that it would be better to rally a 2/3 majority of people behind one of: No / Yes (A) / Yes (B) / Yes (C) in order to not dilute the importance of language changes. It would prevent accepting an important change where a lot of people agrees on a general idea but have strong opinions/arguments on implementation/details. Cheers, Patrick --f46d04388df118d1220510f01d94--