Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84466 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 64415 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2015 12:26:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Mar 2015 12:26:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=sebastian@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=sebastian@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 93.190.64.237 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: sebastian@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 93.190.64.237 mail-1.de-punkt.de Received: from [93.190.64.237] ([93.190.64.237:51910] helo=mail-1.de-punkt.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 02/9D-29848-9719DF45 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 07:26:36 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail-1.de-punkt.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21043A2D2 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 13:26:29 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail-1.de-punkt.de Received: from mail-1.de-punkt.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail-1.de-punkt.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H1vc1BwcOKEU for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 13:26:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.178.24] (p4FC7CD5F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.199.205.95]) (Authenticated sender: php@sebastian-bergmann.de) by mail-1.de-punkt.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CCB83A269 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 13:26:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54FD9173.4040703@php.net> Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 13:26:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <438F62BF-E1D3-484E-8242-C616F6007811@heroku.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Exceptions in the engine From: sebastian@php.net (Sebastian Bergmann) Am 09.03.2015 um 12:40 schrieb Dan Ackroyd: > So even though I hope we can clean up the exception hierarchy, merging > the engine exceptions is the right choice imo. Sounds reasonable to me. I'm wondering, though, whether we really need an additional RFC for the change I suggested as nobody spoke out against it and several were in favor.