Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84405
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.52 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: marcio3w@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <001b01d058c9$e6983570$b3c8a050$@tutteli.ch>
References: <CABDNdAE+7J3ViNR8844kBQsYzLDsWP-YAkKSQhD8v5GFL1Ky-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <010801d055d3$ed5a8fa0$c80faee0$@tutteli.ch> <CABDNdAFBt_ep2WBdm97_wvJV-VEVvccmf-VBCq33Dk3752c+bg@mail.gmail.com>
 <004d01d05696$9d797410$d86c5c30$@tutteli.ch> <CABDNdAGArPbE2NYe8Z03GQ9+t6UQQigKoJgjoBA6h_+2ffzXGw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ26g5SJ_+51MJ==mom4=dj_481ShiCoj4FD36odyjsdO6oQMQ@mail.gmail.com> <001b01d058c9$e6983570$b3c8a050$@tutteli.ch>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 13:35:34 -0300
Message-ID: <CAOsHV+sVbx7gkdmw2DFYGfZjsjo9AQBsA9KV7yRWe4x3bPhPFA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Stoll <php@tutteli.ch>
Cc: Patrick Schaaf <php@bof.de>, Philip Sturgeon <pjsturgeon@gmail.com>, 
	internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013c665a1f406b0510b56507
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Anonymous Classes
From: marcio.web2@gmail.com (Marcio Almada)

--089e013c665a1f406b0510b56507
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

2015-03-07 8:28 GMT-03:00 Robert Stoll <php@tutteli.ch>:

>
> > -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Patrick Schaaf [mailto:php@bof.de]
> > Gesendet: Samstag, 7. M=C3=A4rz 2015 08:22
> > An: Philip Sturgeon
> > Cc: internals; Robert Stoll
> > Betreff: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Anonymous Classes
> >
> > Am 06.03.2015 20:14 schrieb "Philip Sturgeon" <pjsturgeon@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > Right, this here RFC has been drastically improved.
> > >
> > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/anonymous_classes
> > >
> > > Anyone got any doubts or troubles at this point?
> >
> > Can we / could we do "extends self", "extends static", or even "extends
> $someclassname" ?
> >
> > The first two could be handy in factory like object methods, and the
> last one generally in factory methods.
> >
> > best regards
> >   Patrick
>
> Personally, I would go step by step. First introduce anonymous classes an=
d
> then extend it with features like the one described above - should be les=
s
> controversial.
> The last construct idea described by you would introduce dynamic
> inheritance to a certain degree and I am not so sure if that is really a
> good idea
>
> Cheers,
> Robert
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
That's not controversial, it seems like a basic feature we should have. As
anonymous classes is a major feature, adding "extends self" and "extends
static" at a later stage would only cause portability issues between
different versions of PHP7. If we are going to have this, better add it now=
.

+1

Cheers,
M=C3=A1rcio

--089e013c665a1f406b0510b56507--