Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84396 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 71169 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2015 07:22:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Mar 2015 07:22:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@bof.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@bof.de; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain bof.de designates 80.242.145.70 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@bof.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.242.145.70 mars.intermailgate.com Received: from [80.242.145.70] ([80.242.145.70:56645] helo=mars.intermailgate.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B7/C0-58365-437AAF45 for ; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 02:22:30 -0500 Received: (qmail 17095 invoked by uid 1009); 7 Mar 2015 08:22:25 +0100 Received: from 209.85.192.44 by mars (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.96.2/20157. spamassassin: 3.3.1. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:1(209.85.192.44):. Processed in 0.26249 secs); 07 Mar 2015 07:22:25 -0000 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: php@bof.de via mars X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:1(209.85.192.44):. Processed in 0.26249 secs Process 17088) Received: from mail-qg0-f44.google.com (gmail@bof.de@209.85.192.44) by mars.intermailgate.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Mar 2015 08:22:25 +0100 Received: by qgfi50 with SMTP id i50so17945651qgf.10 for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 23:22:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.135.207 with SMTP id 198mr24504524qhh.71.1425712942714; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 23:22:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.82.198 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 23:22:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.82.198 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 23:22:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <010801d055d3$ed5a8fa0$c80faee0$@tutteli.ch> <004d01d05696$9d797410$d86c5c30$@tutteli.ch> Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 08:22:22 +0100 Message-ID: To: Philip Sturgeon Cc: internals , Robert Stoll Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135dfa28095d40510ada935 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Anonymous Classes From: php@bof.de (Patrick Schaaf) --001a1135dfa28095d40510ada935 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Am 06.03.2015 20:14 schrieb "Philip Sturgeon" : > > Right, this here RFC has been drastically improved. > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/anonymous_classes > > Anyone got any doubts or troubles at this point? Can we / could we do "extends self", "extends static", or even "extends $someclassname" ? The first two could be handy in factory like object methods, and the last one generally in factory methods. best regards Patrick --001a1135dfa28095d40510ada935--