Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84295 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 97633 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2015 17:00:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Mar 2015 17:00:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=sebastian@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=sebastian@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 93.190.64.238 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: sebastian@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 93.190.64.238 mail-2.de-punkt.de Received: from [93.190.64.238] ([93.190.64.238:57121] helo=mail-99.de-punkt.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CA/A5-56703-91A37F45 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 12:00:10 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail-99.de-punkt.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0383A272 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:00:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail-2.de-punkt.de Received: from mail-99.de-punkt.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail-2.de-punkt.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L7CwXlXFcvbl for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:00:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.178.24] (p4FC7CBD2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.199.203.210]) (Authenticated sender: php@sebastian-bergmann.de) by mail-99.de-punkt.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D8C83A1DA for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:00:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54F73A15.1080200@php.net> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 18:00:05 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV][RFC][VOTING] Context Sensitive Lexer From: sebastian@php.net (Sebastian Bergmann) Am 04.03.2015 um 09:52 schrieb Nikita Popov: > So, tl;dr: I think the patch is too risky. Even if we can make sure that > we've covered all the current edge-cases and don't regress anything, I'm > afraid that this will cause complications with future changes. This ends up > replicating too many parsing aspects in the lexer in a rather ad-hoc manner. I trust Nikita's expertise and have removed my +1 vote. I really want to have what this RFC aims for but not at the price of robustness (regressions) and flexibility (impediment for future feature development).