Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84289
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com designates 209.85.192.179 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <54F72360.6000702@lerdorf.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 07:23:12 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>
CC: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <CAGa2bXYa5Lz0JqySVSQ+hGfCW-WxxKWvqFtWaZo=OVf+LLsV8A@mail.gmail.com> <CAEZPtU6=KY2tzRE8yw6kEdh4SrVJ3uG81XX5yuu0E_63G1HN6g@mail.gmail.com> <54F4E29D.7080501@garfieldtech.com> <CAGa2bXbph51CUHr_G87FL65hSDfLSDHo14Bnke-vaLu7SmH=ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <54F4E93C.80206@gmail.com> <54F4EBEC.2090702@garfieldtech.com> <CAGa2bXaQ0SgLWdv7WCoo_qyOQH=t2Vi_bwpk7qXZDEUk+7S7ew@mail.gmail.com> <54F4F3FC.6060501@fischer.name> <CAGa2bXb-d7A3So8e76=p5qqxrZgLK2B_4RKA1OKg0nHZiw9z6A@mail.gmail.com> <54F4FDFB.8010701@lsces.co.uk> <CAGa2bXZUvJJVDVj-48qpPuMas12fnDigKGcE-r=TK20Sahyi7w@mail.gmail.com> <54F5895D.3090002@gmail.com> <CAGa2bXbuNEcvoeeBhkUUEkiHZJFvJTVX=h_JPTLHpMTtgbCokw@mail.gmail.com> <554F0C3F-770F-4694-A5AB-FDC54FCCBF00@gmail.com> <CAGa2bXbDdS=N=JmPwBa1iorx1aJPuo00EfU7bw31cknAxAfDyQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEu+QUX1j2P+OfU+Sf_wUOQzYrLody0zPF6V9rVWvYjGFfbrSg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGa2bXZYG37qdkjTkoDq12GtYTwS-=gX-=msPx3RWeSenxSdqw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGa2bXZYG37qdkjTkoDq12GtYTwS-=gX-=msPx3RWeSenxSdqw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="aTiaXR8GTIUtqKfvb3nPs84jga1GvKvMi"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Consistent function names
From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf)

--aTiaXR8GTIUtqKfvb3nPs84jga1GvKvMi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 03/03/2015 07:34 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>=20
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Michael Schuett <michaeljs1990@gmail.c=
om>
> wrote:
>=20
>> Your evaluation is pretty anecdotal. I agree with some points but you =
need
>> some solid evidence if you are going to rate these languages. Also do =
you
>> have a list of all the functions you would like to rename or is this a=

>> sweeping lets just change everything so it matches and deprecate all t=
he
>> old stuff. Your matrix is a very weak push to do so. If you want to ma=
ke
>> these changes it would be better to choose a select set such as the ar=
ray
>> functions and try and push that through or see what that change might =
look
>> like and if it's really beneficial to userland.
>=20
>=20
> I agree that my evaluation is subjective. For example, I rate PHP has "=
1"
> security only
> because PHP is very weak against script/file inclusions because it's fa=
tal
> and other
> languages apps do not have script/file inclusions as PHP apps do. Other=
s
> might
> rate "2" or even "3" because it is too easy to fix it even if incident =
is
> fatal.
> (Security should be evaluated by "how difficult to make mistakes", not =
"how
> easy to
> fix mistakes" generally. IMHO)
>=20
> I made list of rename candidates
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/consistent_function_names#list_of_functions_to=
_be_renamed
> If you have suggestions, I appreciate!

Yasuo, please stop. This isn't going to happen. Changing strlen() to
str_len() is just ridiculous.

-Rasmus



--aTiaXR8GTIUtqKfvb3nPs84jga1GvKvMi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlT3I2AACgkQlxayKTuqOuAUDwCeLMF5CIEAU6u/WORDEkUioxSG
v1MAnRpP6yApevbJ9YhxOV4FmEtu8/wP
=/GMy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--aTiaXR8GTIUtqKfvb3nPs84jga1GvKvMi--