Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84288 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 62791 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2015 10:36:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Mar 2015 10:36:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.214 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.214 mail4-2.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.214] ([217.147.176.214:60119] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EC/11-56703-E00E6F45 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 05:35:59 -0500 Received: (qmail 7365 invoked by uid 89); 4 Mar 2015 10:35:56 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 7359, pid: 7362, t: 0.0757s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52/d:10677 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.8?) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@86.189.147.37) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 4 Mar 2015 10:35:56 -0000 Message-ID: <54F6E00B.2060508@lsces.co.uk> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 10:35:55 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <54F4E29D.7080501@garfieldtech.com> <54F4E93C.80206@gmail.com> <54F4EBEC.2090702@garfieldtech.com> <54F4F3FC.6060501@fischer.name> <54F4FDFB.8010701@lsces.co.uk> <54F5895D.3090002@gmail.com> <554F0C3F-770F-4694-A5AB-FDC54FCCBF00@gmail.com> <54F6C936.9080406@lsces.co.uk> <6242A102-28DB-42F7-A99C-3C08C5020799@php.net> In-Reply-To: <6242A102-28DB-42F7-A99C-3C08C5020799@php.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Consistent function names From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) On 04/03/15 10:16, Michael Wallner wrote: >> While http has been rejected for bundling, it is another example of not >> > following the C coding standard … > Lester, please stop posting walls of unrelated text. You’re totally off track. If we’re talking about coding standards, we’re not talking about PSR, but http://lxr.php.net/xref/PHP_TRUNK/CODING_STANDARDS In that case the rules should be applied to everything that is added to PHP rather than being selective? The points still apply ... Personally I have no interest in PSR and would prefer that PHP_TRUNK/CODING_STANDARDS was a rule that was followed before extensions like http were even debated, but the inconsistencies that are being objected to are to address complaints in 'PHP' space rather than 'C' space, and it has already been accepted that different rules apply there anyway :( I got chewed out last time I pointed out that PHP_TRUNK/CODING_STANDARDS is not being followed in 'PHP' space ... -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk