Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84178
Return-Path: <me@kelunik.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 56616 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2015 19:05:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 2 Mar 2015 19:05:24 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=me@kelunik.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=me@kelunik.com; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain kelunik.com from 81.169.146.217 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: me@kelunik.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.146.217 mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de  
Received: from [81.169.146.217] ([81.169.146.217:55009] helo=mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id A3/76-14834-274B4F45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:05:23 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1425323120; l=2435;
	s=domk; d=kelunik.com;
	h=Content-Type:Cc:To:Subject:Date:From:References:MIME-Version;
	bh=DZ5VYWzy/eHphiWo23BIXA38WgR8g2ChEMK0uoPWCpo=;
	b=OE1dIXFT1qyDiJ0Px42jYcHNMmxqOCwdTcReboaifLGA1ORxu/uxl5ILFyKHcxy5zzp
	P8YKPqUGoApc9cOOlrKxz6uVM907Xetd5B4cX0+Yj28sGDC4U9KURzpLWpedj3qo6UPvz
	nJJLlUtU6vS0v3lRV6UZDj7NfE1D4LYz18o=
X-RZG-AUTH: :IWkkfkWkbvHsXQGmRYmUo9mls2vWuiu+7SLDup6E67mzuoNNBqD/uL4=
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178])
	by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 37.3 AUTH)
	with ESMTPSA id z0693br22J5K5hA
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	for <internals@lists.php.net>;
	Mon, 2 Mar 2015 20:05:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wivr20 with SMTP id r20so17287072wiv.2
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:05:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.180.11.205 with SMTP id s13mr38455561wib.32.1425323120181;
 Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:05:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAH8MpnmTj8Y5cST2M0LQZFKiV6sp_sPV=h8dku3_HPxsQYeYOg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ26g5SXGhFB6OQqbe7NoWC7sNgzeyhvjrAVXfrH21hgDhS_=A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH8Mpnmw8eC6YOk6M6D-PoP-2zY20_GzAEgZRLBiA9Uw1yL-4Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAH8Mpnnin64H94wYDX_xQTamkZLQjxkCbkytf4C5+sfq+DguLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 19:05:19 +0000
Message-ID: <CANUQDCih62xnJHPZ9rHNOsKppmJDR=zvuEYya0knsH4+9TE7=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Lowrey <rdlowrey@php.net>
Cc: internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c23eee44cb34051052e673
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC Discuss] Generator Delegation
From: me@kelunik.com (Niklas Keller)

--001a11c23eee44cb34051052e673
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I prefer yield from, because it yields that value from the generator. Yield
use doesn't make any sense to me if I read those words.

Additionally, it's already used by another language.

Regards, Niklas

Daniel Lowrey <rdlowrey@php.net> schrieb am Mo., 02.03.2015, 17:13:

> From initial discussions it seems prudent to modify the Generator
> Delegation RFC to use either of:
>
>   - yield from <expr>
>   - yield use <expr>
>
> The `yield from` form would add a single T_YIELD_FROM token (as opposed t=
o
> a new "from" reserved word). The `yield use` form would reuse existing
> keywords. I'd like to get feedback from people on preferences between the=
se
> two options before modifying the RFC. If general consensus isn't reached
> this can be a voting option, but I prefer a traditional yes/no vote
> to m=C3=A9nage =C3=A0 trois.
>
> Thanks again for your participation.
>

--001a11c23eee44cb34051052e673--