Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84172
Return-Path: <rdlowrey@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 36451 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2015 16:13:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 2 Mar 2015 16:13:04 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rdlowrey@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rdlowrey@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.223.178 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rdlowrey@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.223.178 mail-ie0-f178.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.223.178] ([209.85.223.178:34641] helo=mail-ie0-f178.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 0C/23-14834-F0C84F45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:13:04 -0500
Received: by iecrp18 with SMTP id rp18so49103535iec.1
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 08:13:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=1eEObfp0cWkQRatRrCqZCSFRdnJoMD068xMocpuA+K0=;
        b=UxVrV/Dd4HmQjL8mf5yfsCcq+M9q851eMTEQ6fTutbU5Sy45dy+37GNw0BnNDiaHKA
         JUeYXjeeFgOyx5DRUPVBhjIWDv5vcjxDJ74SVNiJQkA8kapZBH1S2IDB+jYFpLlXd29B
         4gmMj86klBdy7dscntsVlbyewJjmsgnTw1ePQeLZVRnld7hLT0LABc3ZVp5l69BjYLdk
         XW/EhhoXweN+tB2hoY4Yy7bRweWYkv1eaDAuyTGhkDtd9Xc1nMJ5OgeZ1rQY9uOSXcx7
         QPSqaCXj00sxg3pTXEtG3vc56/PFah3XTeuaOkYRV+ORBTonOiMZBZJ6noDzNdkbdgRw
         iVAg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.12.13 with SMTP id w13mr37191232ioi.28.1425312781424;
 Mon, 02 Mar 2015 08:13:01 -0800 (PST)
Sender: rdlowrey@gmail.com
Received: by 10.50.156.198 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 08:13:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAH8Mpnmw8eC6YOk6M6D-PoP-2zY20_GzAEgZRLBiA9Uw1yL-4Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH8MpnmTj8Y5cST2M0LQZFKiV6sp_sPV=h8dku3_HPxsQYeYOg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ26g5SXGhFB6OQqbe7NoWC7sNgzeyhvjrAVXfrH21hgDhS_=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH8Mpnmw8eC6YOk6M6D-PoP-2zY20_GzAEgZRLBiA9Uw1yL-4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 11:13:01 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: -SXIlY2Mpe-pxc7OQZi8CXlVj80
Message-ID: <CAH8Mpnnin64H94wYDX_xQTamkZLQjxkCbkytf4C5+sfq+DguLg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Lowrey <rdlowrey@php.net>
Cc: internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ed65407e1580510507eed
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC Discuss] Generator Delegation
From: rdlowrey@php.net (Daniel Lowrey)

--001a113ed65407e1580510507eed
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

From initial discussions it seems prudent to modify the Generator
Delegation RFC to use either of:

  - yield from <expr>
  - yield use <expr>

The `yield from` form would add a single T_YIELD_FROM token (as opposed to
a new "from" reserved word). The `yield use` form would reuse existing
keywords. I'd like to get feedback from people on preferences between these
two options before modifying the RFC. If general consensus isn't reached
this can be a voting option, but I prefer a traditional yes/no vote
to m=C3=A9nage =C3=A0 trois.

Thanks again for your participation.

--001a113ed65407e1580510507eed--