Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84145
Return-Path: <php@bof.de>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 29440 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2015 06:34:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 2 Mar 2015 06:34:25 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@bof.de; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@bof.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain bof.de designates 80.242.145.70 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@bof.de
X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.242.145.70 mars.intermailgate.com  
Received: from [80.242.145.70] ([80.242.145.70:48587] helo=mars.intermailgate.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id B7/80-25952-F6404F45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 01:34:24 -0500
Received: (qmail 15132 invoked by uid 1009); 2 Mar 2015 07:34:20 +0100
Received: from 209.85.216.180 by mars (envelope-from <php@bof.de>, uid 89) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms 
 (clamdscan: 0.96.2/20133. spamassassin: 3.3.1. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms.  
 Clear:RC:1(209.85.216.180):. 
 Processed in 0.264733 secs); 02 Mar 2015 06:34:20 -0000
X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: php@bof.de via mars
X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:1(209.85.216.180):. Processed in 0.264733 secs Process 15118)
Received: from mail-qc0-f180.google.com (gmail@bof.de@209.85.216.180)
  by mars.intermailgate.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 2 Mar 2015 07:34:20 +0100
Received: by qcxm20 with SMTP id m20so23010810qcx.0
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sun, 01 Mar 2015 22:34:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.102.170 with SMTP id w39mr46531916qge.100.1425278058524;
 Sun, 01 Mar 2015 22:34:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.140.82.198 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 22:34:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.140.82.198 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 22:34:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAH8MpnmTj8Y5cST2M0LQZFKiV6sp_sPV=h8dku3_HPxsQYeYOg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH8MpnmTj8Y5cST2M0LQZFKiV6sp_sPV=h8dku3_HPxsQYeYOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 07:34:18 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ26g5SXGhFB6OQqbe7NoWC7sNgzeyhvjrAVXfrH21hgDhS_=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Lowrey <rdlowrey@php.net>
Cc: internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1672c62856305104868c3
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC Discuss] Generator Delegation
From: php@bof.de (Patrick Schaaf)

--001a11c1672c62856305104868c3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Am 02.03.2015 00:52 schrieb "Daniel Lowrey" <rdlowrey@php.net>:
>
> I'd like to initiate discussion on a proposal to implement generator
> delegation via the following new syntax inside generator functions:
>
>     yield * <expr>
>
> The Generator Delegation RFC is available here:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/generator-delegation

I like the feature. The syntax is awful. What about "yield use (expr)"? No
new keywords, somewhat gramatical, and currently invalid syntax, as far as
I can tell.

Patrick

--001a11c1672c62856305104868c3--