Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84099 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 1284 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2015 09:40:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Mar 2015 09:40:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.214 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.214 mail4-2.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.214] ([217.147.176.214:43343] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 32/F4-63732-48ED2F45 for ; Sun, 01 Mar 2015 04:40:21 -0500 Received: (qmail 18304 invoked by uid 89); 1 Mar 2015 09:40:18 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 18296, pid: 18300, t: 0.0709s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52/d:10677 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.8?) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@86.189.147.37) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 1 Mar 2015 09:40:17 -0000 Message-ID: <54F2DE81.1090703@lsces.co.uk> Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 09:40:17 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <54F0540C.1040807@gmail.com> <54F20D17.9050506@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][DISCUSSION] Remove allow_url_include INI From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) On 01/03/15 00:37, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: >> Yes, the global vs local setting issue is distinct from the question of >> > "is phar://blah a URL?" > > I think your question is about remote/local resource. > Is phar:// local resource? It's yes. > Is phar:// URL/URI? I think it depends how people understand URL/URI. > file:// is considered URI/URL even if it's local resource. A URI consists of two parts ... URL (where/what the resource is) URN (the name of the resource) phar: and file: are URL scheme names and yes there is nothing here to designate if the resource is local or remote. So yes allow_url_include is a totally wrong description anyway? Simply because at the time is was added I don't think local url's were even considered? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk