Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84093
Return-Path: <leight@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 74100 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2015 03:53:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 1 Mar 2015 03:53:16 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=leight@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=leight@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.182 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: leight@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.182 mail-vc0-f182.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.220.182] ([209.85.220.182:42527] helo=mail-vc0-f182.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 2E/B1-63732-A2D82F45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 22:53:15 -0500
Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id id10so8869557vcb.13
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 19:53:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=RYPmuRVunP6VStSuAvuCbZZJrkacAexsasg5JM+tSVY=;
        b=xfGDSW0KobfSeRLM1K0AmYATbk9sV3F/5+cY2zTVZQomnxAwxu2JPjK60S+dsCXzxD
         FAs7uTnBhlAIHvq0/fghlP9v7ezJohtKG7yzU7t9AV6nc+BiwK8XS4gB/Qm2lbNTajNB
         EJwj4r0foeduYSjfAknSvmclWScBSThzM8ACe+X0hnOT735aN5U98vCLAwB2Gx2yMWUm
         KsD4qNp2/ApWGh3Na0mhG00Una1J2OYhTnnIdFjFGWvUEd9UCVy8DWzNqZLaXVLrU+f6
         /HZlRE6h6snARdE03YdLDt6xS3+nFwdYQRWW+6jZIx1h4/jHZGjs5zOPy1g6ezaL1bJ/
         dc4w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.25.11 with SMTP id y11mr19759896vdf.51.1425181992627;
 Sat, 28 Feb 2015 19:53:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.177.10 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 19:53:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54F28864.7000007@gmail.com>
References: <CAGa2bXbX3uPbSsgrEMqktD=X6S6xGqTkfHdqSZotkZ9kKifDhA@mail.gmail.com>
	<54F28864.7000007@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 03:53:12 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPwsocF8n2a91P=2YxsLPHxz+7GeBLM3THRKt0VAVzfgEXayYg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>
Cc: Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>, "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Design by Contract - Vote only RFC
From: leight@gmail.com (Leigh)

On 1 March 2015 at 03:32, Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't see why the first one needs any vote. It is supposed to be
> implemented as an extension, so why not go and implement an extension,
> and put it in PECL, and then propose it for core inclusion, if it proves
> popular?

Agree

> As for the second one, do we really need the syntax change that would
> just move asserts to before { instead of after? If we already have
> zero-cost asserts, why just not use them?

Agree


@yasuo. The votes are closed.