Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:84030
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain pascal-martin.fr designates 91.121.85.26 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <54F0A71B.3050004@pascal-martin.fr>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:19:23 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <54E79F88.6050405@php.net> <F52C3B32-72BB-4E62-B4BE-B7F77929D165@php.net>
In-Reply-To: <F52C3B32-72BB-4E62-B4BE-B7F77929D165@php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][VOTE] pecl_http
From: mailing@pascal-martin.fr ("Pascal MARTIN, AFUP")


Le 26/02/2015 12:28, Michael Wallner a écrit :
> I forgot to formally declare a voting period, so I’ll do so now.
>
> Voting will end on Feb, 27th at 21:00 UTC, so if you didn’t vote yet, please do so until then.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http#vote

Hi,

Not many of us at AFUP participated in our discussion about this 
proposal, but it seems we would be on the -1 side.

Basically, even if a good HTTP layer is a good thing, we feel it kind of 
has its place more in user-land than in PHP itself.

Adding this to PHP would mean more maintenance work on PHP itself, but 
also releases synced with releases of PHP -- which, in the end, is not 
that interesting for end-users, we think.

In any case, thanks for your work!

-- 
Pascal MARTIN, AFUP - French UG
http://php-internals.afup.org/