Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83956 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54722 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2015 02:48:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Feb 2015 02:48:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=francois@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=francois@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 212.27.42.2 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: francois@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.27.42.2 smtp2-g21.free.fr Received: from [212.27.42.2] ([212.27.42.2:51770] helo=smtp2-g21.free.fr) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 87/CD-32582-6FADFE45 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 21:48:22 -0500 Received: from moorea (unknown [82.240.16.115]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7974B010F; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:47:58 +0100 (CET) Reply-To: To: "'Pierre Joye'" , "'Matthew Weier O'Phinney'" Cc: "'PHP internals'" References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:48:14 +0100 Message-ID: <0ae001d05237$d57b2240$807166c0$@php.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQI+foPC9+gKUbaeko12y549XfdpdgJyaOSMnBPeSoA= Content-Language: fr X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150226-1, 26/02/2015), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Follow-up to STH user experience, this time with actual testing From: francois@php.net (=?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?=) > De : Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com] > And now let wait all other cases not covered by errors but casting to > different values, maybe only a few, maybe none, we simply do not know. Pierre, excuse me to repeat here, because I jst replied the same in = another thread but there is no 'casting to different values'. That's why = I didn't understand when you adked about failures on different casting. = This is a pure subset. We diable cases, but absolutely don't change = conversions. I agree that changing conversion rules would be terrible. It is = absolutely not the case. Our only fault is to have made this not clear = enough in the RFC. Regards Fran=C3=A7ois