Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83950
Return-Path: <francois@php.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 39454 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2015 01:41:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 27 Feb 2015 01:41:23 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=francois@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=francois@php.net; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 212.27.42.2 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: francois@php.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.27.42.2 smtp2-g21.free.fr  
Received: from [212.27.42.2] ([212.27.42.2:47417] helo=smtp2-g21.free.fr)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id F9/AA-32582-24BCFE45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 20:41:22 -0500
Received: from moorea (unknown [82.240.16.115])
	by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320104B008C;
	Fri, 27 Feb 2015 02:40:59 +0100 (CET)
Reply-To: <francois@php.net>
To: "'Anthony Ferrara'" <ircmaxell@gmail.com>,
	"'Zeev Suraski'" <zeev@zend.com>
Cc: <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <BAY178-W418C61DF38879BED71640EDE140@phx.gbl>	<3d639901ae85227b219e7ee59b3140fe@mail.gmail.com>	<CA+kxMuQ52SOWp0dP0okVHrb8wF9U5TUX8OcYpNBP4rEPvdrpFA@mail.gmail.com>	<CALrkBjYO0SGXBDiSJhxSpnG80S_qerTLL2SX4vi0WygstnM+gw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAyV7nFM9fZYs7b+UiWrmHFcNHwqzRKYFgdeimuNTazZvZx2FA@mail.gmail.com>	<fe4ee2db32d7096f196019d6492f1d90@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAyV7nGg1g_iezQbF5SwL2pocVDPbY5j4BSWqEVXdL28y2TRng@mail.gmail.com>	<42bc7c079a67fe1aa982b5c55ecc2f16@mail.gmail.com> <CAAyV7nFDenxegkQvf21qfitWzk8GKv8j9OX6Jq8SkyFpDK6Xgg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAyV7nFDenxegkQvf21qfitWzk8GKv8j9OX6Jq8SkyFpDK6Xgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 02:41:15 +0100
Message-ID: <0aca01d0522e$79c08de0$6d41a9a0$@php.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGwbbdURx2shUG2o7Zj2Ywptu8MnAHNhHseASj3TG8CBU/YnAHY8IsNAn8zUX0BDEv+qAJWJD9/AgdVbcOczZGHkA==
Content-Language: fr
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150226-1, 26/02/2015), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] A different user perspective on scalar type declarations
From: francois@php.net (=?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?=)

> De : Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmaxell@gmail.com]
=20
> They run without triggering E_DEPRECATED errors? Because that means
> they will break with 8 (which by your own words is closer to 2-3 years
> out than 9-10).

Absolutely no date is planned to switch E_DEPRECATED to =
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR. It must be clear for everyone that we don't have to =
hurry there. My personal opinion is that it cannot be before at least 5 =
years, and maybe more. If I had to announce a major version, I would say =
9, not 8. And no decision will be made before we have a large consensus =
about it. Once again, there will be no good reason to hurry for it.

Zeev, can't we put a sentence in the RFC where we state that the =
E_DEPRECATED stage cannot be turned off before, say, 5 years at least ? =
Once the statement is voted with the RFC, users are protected.

Regards

Fran=C3=A7ois