Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:8394 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 12045 invoked by uid 1010); 5 Mar 2004 20:11:17 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11824 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2004 20:11:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.bytecamp.net) (212.204.60.9) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 5 Mar 2004 20:11:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 24970 invoked by uid 85); 5 Mar 2004 20:11:14 -0000 Received: from redeye@erisx.de by mail.bytecamp.net by uid 88 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.54. Clear:RC:0(217.229.27.112):. Processed in 0.139006 secs); 05 Mar 2004 20:11:14 -0000 Received: from pd9e51b70.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO erisx.de) (redeye%erisx.de@217.229.27.112) by mail.bytecamp.net with SMTP; 5 Mar 2004 20:11:14 -0000 Message-ID: <4048E00D.4020709@erisx.de> Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 21:16:13 +0100 Reply-To: redeye@erisx.de Organization: ErisX Development User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Walter A. Boring IV" CC: Andi Gutmans , internals@lists.php.net References: <5.1.0.14.2.20040305150646.02369550@127.0.0.1> <1078508280.4048baf8bd2ef@www.3gstech.com> In-Reply-To: <1078508280.4048baf8bd2ef@www.3gstech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Rolling RC1 From: redeye@erisx.de (Red Wingate) This one is kinda annoying as well: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=26286&edit=1 Just ran into this just a few minutes ago. Tried to solve the problem using a new Snapshot but this didn't solve my problem, also using a diffrent apache2 version didn't change anything either. Red Walter A. Boring IV wrote: > It seems this one should be addressed before RC1 IMO > http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=27227 > > Walt > > Quoting Andi Gutmans : > > >>Hey, >> >>I've fixed all of the major bugs I wanted to get done for RC1. >>The only thing we should finalize is the hasMore() thing (I wouldn't want >>to change such an API after RC1). >>Did we decide to go with isValid()? Marcus what do you sya? >> >>Andi >> >>-- >>PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >>To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> > >