Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83834
Return-Path: <yohgaki@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 61253 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2015 22:35:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2015 22:35:08 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.43 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.43 mail-qg0-f43.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.192.43] ([209.85.192.43:55558] helo=mail-qg0-f43.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 38/45-34010-C1E4EE45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:35:08 -0500
Received: by mail-qg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id i50so5760487qgf.2
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:35:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:content-type;
        bh=jG4JAlM8TQ053M0FdPAg6RMo9AAijtsT9ltnR3Okb0c=;
        b=JYiqPq9yT+kFtOFtkT1qWNRBQZzspZcZDHbJ1c/x6Y3uVXbZClcII70afw4dGAHvnX
         FNa5rlE07/4yZmaIOAXzq1xqse0aD3AV/Tx/KDuJP7//E6KyQE+AtPZ6ZE7by6VjaA3w
         bs3LhDRfe0xpr2wUhZw+bBk5VhcV7T4d1eZkoQUf8lZhzay8FVpkgor8asnNEb/QaOgl
         PKLFDPQ13sXc5/oje432x68kWS88gF7WKZivVecW22P1JXj+o0OTTbwn/a+W+7KcgwME
         l2hiAoVNyzpnmHuRWFHvYFSwqm5atTMVxyhr33OJdlHKI7hsznLWzIwGBiLjksaFLlJE
         w+dA==
X-Received: by 10.140.93.195 with SMTP id d61mr11342892qge.48.1424903705634;
 Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:35:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
Received: by 10.229.198.8 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:34:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGa2bXbt9FAdRtW1GxDyT+G-4bWBACTso_DOizcSHmmgmSVtmA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGa2bXbt9FAdRtW1GxDyT+G-4bWBACTso_DOizcSHmmgmSVtmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 07:34:25 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4z_RLkjjTwTCideHGjoZ0WE2Rl0
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXb5QEKOggRbUnmVHuib=P_tJ9_W+QyMa_SCpc7RmSCgSA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>, Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113b95e236af22050ff13ff2
Subject: Re: [RFC][VOTE] Introduce script only include/require
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

--001a113b95e236af22050ff13ff2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Stas,

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote:

> It seems there are misunderstandings about the issue and the protection.
> If you would like to vote "no", please read the RFC carefully.
> If you find fatal reason to reject this RFC, it is about arbitrarily code
> execution
> and file exposure, so please let us know the reason why.
>

I saw you voted "no".
Could you share us the reason behind?

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net

--001a113b95e236af22050ff13ff2--