Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83770 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 8088 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2015 11:45:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2015 11:45:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mailing@pascal-martin.fr; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mailing@pascal-martin.fr; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain pascal-martin.fr designates 91.121.85.26 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mailing@pascal-martin.fr X-Host-Fingerprint: 91.121.85.26 ns362529.ip-91-121-85.eu Received: from [91.121.85.26] ([91.121.85.26:50079] helo=pascal-martin.fr) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DE/29-62407-FD5BDE45 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 06:45:35 -0500 Received: from [192.168.10.8] (teaebook.pck.nerim.net [213.41.140.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pascal-martin.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 557EAE05FF for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:45:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54EDB5DA.7090302@pascal-martin.fr> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:45:30 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV][RFC][VOTE] Group Use Declarations From: mailing@pascal-martin.fr ("Pascal MARTIN, AFUP") Le 11/02/2015 21:50, Marcio Almada a écrit : > Since no new discussion topics appeared, the voting on the Group Use > Declarations RFC for PHP7 is now open: Hi, We've discussed this RFC with other people of AFUP, and even though there have been quite a few mails exchanged, I'm sorry to say we didn't reach a consensus -- and, as such, are neither -1 nor +1. Trying to summarize a few points: * Some are worried about the impacts on visibility -- while other said it would enhance it. * Some reported that their IDE deals with imports. * But several also noted this syntactic sugar could be helpful. In any case, those on the +1 side agree it should be with the trailing "\". Sorry this is probably not that helpful, and thanks for your work! -- Pascal MARTIN, AFUP - French UG http://php-internals.afup.org/