Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83763
Return-Path: <yohgaki@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 95060 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2015 10:44:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2015 10:44:18 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.47 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.47 mail-qa0-f47.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.216.47] ([209.85.216.47:62013] helo=mail-qa0-f47.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id E2/B6-62407-187ADE45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 05:44:17 -0500
Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id v10so2042194qac.6
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 02:44:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=vHI9D6nO3/iVeMvD3d6wkK+e+g+r4Xs5lafTgVacxCY=;
        b=gKPz54dQdx3zdD3LVdTB3i255i9L4oakkrba4x38eC7UP+QOTsM6ZnabylZsuPIlXd
         MfbveKZ5DZQxXum/IE2KpdFCGJ1QRpQ9Z2bFQZUD5Mqrj0Q+IFy7PeF4w+IG9rJH4ntP
         loeLSHg/NAiw7tukCQf4pX4/o36+qcaC7ZYAT+D0vnhgyXVGvDzUDsULb66BAx8CDztX
         9kTpB7CKool0XyV1tvUDWnBukzZg7PyV75N/zG5Xusax2QAod+4f7epaFbVJ9pUgDFqy
         oot1p6VfXrCaeIA60g7k1vG9y95RSSMQ1WKTGNRf/fmZ1LxDi72PXgdbwvmnJgKBbtJX
         vckg==
X-Received: by 10.229.83.196 with SMTP id g4mr5779691qcl.18.1424861055260;
 Wed, 25 Feb 2015 02:44:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
Received: by 10.229.198.8 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 02:43:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAEPJdunUN-=CwmQ4boLJ_OjNPrNna9iVLbAzPgOtcRKRjAt8jg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEPJdunUN-=CwmQ4boLJ_OjNPrNna9iVLbAzPgOtcRKRjAt8jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 19:43:34 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: UIWVrWYiz4cOssgge03rAAzhhcw
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXY9YWmaOYbo16F4vL+JY6iT12iy26ZHorOvDkT=vTkJ8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Eberlei <kontakt@beberlei.de>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133c9e00d9fe1050fe75119
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] The Game Theory of Scalar Type Hint Voting
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

--001a1133c9e00d9fe1050fe75119
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Benjamin,

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Benjamin Eberlei <kontakt@beberlei.de>
wrote:

> with two competing RFCs (has this ever happend before?


There will be another one. DbC.
We will have vote only RFC for 2 competing RFCs if we have
DbC or not, then chose DbC by definition or annotation.

Anyway, Zeev's proposal is much better. IMHO. Since we don't
have RFC owner for older proposal, we may only have vote for
Zeev's proposal.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net

--001a1133c9e00d9fe1050fe75119--