Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83712
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.44 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGa2bXbtvkX9ZHgCEho=Mr1u_eHA-jfutReWOtKU957vJ=PxUQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALYT1YrHA=E13eqzKnLSPSATdxRy_201yVDp-cdPurQeSkBhrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6ZZ1MuoRvZooBgRmxQQ4p5jGFmUoVURwLfgVWhTqpkUg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPwsocH6HHVFYAycO-ZFnTKJzW1J8nuRS-x115ttY=wP0eukAg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU5EQO07tPSazwHbpqF38PdUMNyZhAQoiZ+ejvhnFDcKsg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAyV7nHE_Y-H-m5sgZTM=q-MKDXg0ycitTN+--0bPBQcSd8T2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALwr1G=BqkNrcxmG8DxRoHPo-US_eY=CrBVY7jeY_0Ekzao02g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAyV7nF8YGzDVTccWUSowVzD0=p1eF7e3NLC=zRO0CXiD8nc=w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXbtvkX9ZHgCEho=Mr1u_eHA-jfutReWOtKU957vJ=PxUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:54:58 +0000
Message-ID: <CALwr1G=1GccGAheuegDSznM-DTi=AfzjudgSoCi5JoKkMQK7mg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>
Cc: Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com>, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>, Leigh <leight@gmail.com>, 
	Sammy Kaye Powers <me@sammyk.me>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [DISCUSSION] Reliable user-land CSPRNG
From: padraic.brady@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A1draic_Brady?=)

Hi Yasuo,

On 24 February 2015 at 22:08, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote:
> Random bytes is better. People would use it for IV or like with the
> size of IV. If we use string, users loose effective bits.

Suggestion was for an additional function, so random_bytes() would
still be there ;).


Paddy

--
P=C3=A1draic Brady

http://blog.astrumfutura.com
http://www.survivethedeepend.com