Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83635
Return-Path: <smalyshev@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 13211 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2015 07:20:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 24 Feb 2015 07:20:19 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.45 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.45 mail-pa0-f45.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.220.45] ([209.85.220.45:33040] helo=mail-pa0-f45.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id D1/B0-09240-2362CE45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 02:20:19 -0500
Received: by pabkx10 with SMTP id kx10so34006760pab.0
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:20:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=BenaSMenkzXial2g0/8xvXEaNcqdPjW8soOyUmhnIZ0=;
        b=H0uWMtLZnVr6nyBTNlN+mbPUHguiLZENOxqv4D3rX3wjY7VN83Co36apUoHnUykc+c
         Yqyc5dlh8ILk2ZUp7EBmCnLo6oegO4Ezpwq+P/m1vUXFpGcT/0HBfeY5H2VGNWRB4TTW
         h+tuK4QICQHciuP1E8+oqBIOksYJtAjm2U7Z18ukBFXdRDyHX+mAbnDrYz06BjoUHqrh
         M6aW38LhJmGu40PxX3RqU6rmiTiMR9/iXg0ymABEb9xMvOh13TXbpYk1aJNoIrwxti3j
         EXmuSYVLd1NVi7IVcbenpF4UcQpgNuyMX10GTr31twiShP+7MtFF/ma7b6EKxIEKcSrH
         xy/w==
X-Received: by 10.70.103.38 with SMTP id ft6mr15027417pdb.34.1424762416228;
        Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:20:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Stas-Air.local (108-66-6-48.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.66.6.48])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fm3sm11544754pab.29.2015.02.23.23.20.14
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:20:15 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54EC262D.9050205@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:20:13 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>, 
 PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <CAF+90c-YX6tN63JwwWzn-WH2og2uffjR2YrL_JXsYKSjrQFS1Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF+90c-YX6tN63JwwWzn-WH2og2uffjR2YrL_JXsYKSjrQFS1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Reclassify E_STRICT notices
From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev)

Hi!

> 
> I would like to propose reclassifying our few existing E_STRICT notices and
> removing this error category:
> 
>     https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict

Could you add some more explanation about why it is a good thing? I.e.,
E_STRICT has pretty clear place and hurts no one, why remove it? What we
are trying to accomplish by that? I'm just not seeing how it would be
better without E_STRICT.

-- 
Stas Malyshev
smalyshev@gmail.com