Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83630 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98086 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2015 05:09:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Feb 2015 05:09:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.174 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.174 mail-qc0-f174.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.174] ([209.85.216.174:36482] helo=mail-qc0-f174.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2C/50-29197-B770CE45 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:09:15 -0500 Received: by qcqi8 with SMTP id i8so14818244qcq.3 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 21:09:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Ipa7hlAsapajJaC/hTHePzX1mD2iUh6RqOJUfUDAoTQ=; b=NNABxklQqad4SyZ9a6CIddyTp1wf1k7LXGqctHTFwaueElItkzp4Aaw9SxadN2hWQ/ /MnbSHNWkHyKeiWls1oe/GbwL3YX+Mab35j6+wrHEvVL3r7GB/WLFXDwbKHSgBg/D9iS uQBMNRHg72wvnbeI1MvaF4AKQUlOJtHZXk/QyKemrmx9QzOEKy5SjLDkvWSH+cnPumKT 7gs0jFw23t9RfIHeFpalvLICl2Pw94av5lIA8fTs18FuwIFeEn/S8um6LXpjXeP22fz8 SXZoSDKV9d02oG3gGTsY6YUAh/4kNnUxaJ6B8ttKOXXMLTW/M9gTzLL5xbNHRz7C6Hww V3VQ== X-Received: by 10.141.28.145 with SMTP id f139mr33439287qhe.36.1424754552841; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 21:09:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.198.8 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 21:08:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <081901d04fee$e6de8d60$b49ba820$@php.net> References: <081001d04fe8$dcbc0160$96340420$@php.net> <081901d04fee$e6de8d60$b49ba820$@php.net> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:08:32 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: obHSClXuUEWOhXW1GLCV7fhelN8 Message-ID: To: francois Cc: Pierre Joye , Zeev Suraski , Anthony Ferrara , PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11423cae03aee0050fce8556 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Coercive Scalar Type Hints RFC - BC breaks From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) --001a11423cae03aee0050fce8556 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Francois, On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Fran=C3=A7ois Laupretre wrote: > I don=E2=80=99t understand which E_DEPRECATED you=E2=80=99re talking abou= t. The > E_DEPRECATED mechanism proposed in the RFC is not implemented yet. But, > yes, all these failures will raise E_DEPRECATED, as none of them appears = in > PHP 5. In such a case, hiding E_DEPRECATED will remove every failure. OK. I missed current patch status. Then it seems to early for testing. I think we need result w/o E_DEPRECATED errors. I suggest to wait a little more. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net --001a11423cae03aee0050fce8556--