Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83399 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 36380 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2015 15:41:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Feb 2015 15:41:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.223.179 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.223.179 mail-ie0-f179.google.com Received: from [209.85.223.179] ([209.85.223.179:47075] helo=mail-ie0-f179.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 86/D9-08895-837A8E45 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 10:41:44 -0500 Received: by iecvy18 with SMTP id vy18so14349756iec.13 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 07:41:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=X58VFPTJ2U5RaSy8g2Psd2CpVm5NFyZJbntktFXmGeM=; b=gyiYg9G6qW4nHXY+Hn+fbVaH0TRHn+LYpVSSrQaSqA/EPX+cXcecqE8+h36vXi2LBz iT4TLDL3u5hZxoFoUkttG/yWbEzpfxsdqt9/Np9FhrLwzSU/AQkk0YC7/jK7rDqpkust hxqLOPiT1WtYMxBGxz4HSVajkeji7qu5h/eEqfG3h8YC2OWkJL03oVtHb9uUnYmiYJ3d HRrncebwINffF5QuBBQ9r2QzjX/loGKS+4fFW07wFfPnQ3Zd3IATvo4J8ZN9+2MxWIFj dpLciGgfTCzjmssZN/L6BbUdGG8ySJvM040I8A8rtbg/9uYMBPEj/nrnjQqwPBTBLTjj 2tRg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl5uvFRE3kTVfh9dWmIPhJHYlbwmV7TzREJXTHz1eJGW9z3cjVlEdHCEpV/4mCvv1SIA9orrHDApwFR7h67VhBCc8OsPSa/zUTNQWE1k2dO7Ppa7g4A3wsyiS22sOiRwXeygKPNXIPM1lM1z8pdS9w/1OytAg== X-Received: by 10.42.211.200 with SMTP id gp8mr3233451icb.93.1424533301913; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 07:41:41 -0800 (PST) References: <011801d04a07$83ab1c00$8b015400$@php.net> <7a5d96b34b98ec1f3ee17be7fa6a1e81@mail.gmail.com> <2CBDEB67-3DE3-437D-9AF3-0E6A92027244@zend.com> <4cc0c81c7199a452534bb8edcdb19914@mail.gmail.com> <54E589F6.9030002@garfieldtech.com> <54E66569.8000709@garfieldtech.com> <012001d04d46$271dac90$755905b0$@tutteli.ch> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQGD0sLDaA+/0NIeBlQhQC5OtPA/xwF/LMVUAKMdkVsCrbGuvgKewIvOAjZGY+oCdIzJ3QHfJ9zIAadxn2gCxVQ2xQHNUGiPAhrgFYQBxvwQIwJ0oF2BASMW5AECDyaOZgI/7LjXATYZUjwCKRQXvgFBS+TjnG9UfhA= Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 17:41:41 +0200 Message-ID: <2368568b67f9ec6021b763cd72f67fa5@mail.gmail.com> To: Anthony Ferrara Cc: Larry Garfield , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Reviving scalar type hints From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) > -----Original Message----- > From: Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmaxell@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2015 5:23 PM > To: Zeev Suraski > Cc: Larry Garfield; internals@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Reviving scalar type hints > > I'm fine with that. My interpretation was that the feature freeze would > happen on March 15 (that afterwards no new RFCs would be accepted). > > I made the decision to target 7.next/8 based on the assumption that the > competing RFC would not be able to fairly target 7.0. If you are saying > that's > not the issue, then I'll happily re-target this RFC for > 7.0 again. > > I just didn't want to be seen as (or actually do) pushing based on a > timing > advantage that your proposal couldn't possibly meet. > > So if you're fine with it (which it seems you are), I'll re-target the RFC > now. I am fine with it, as long as we all agree for the lax interpretation of the March 15 deadline (vote must start by then). Thanks, Zeev