Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83394 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28373 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2015 15:22:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Feb 2015 15:22:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ircmaxell@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ircmaxell@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.180 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ircmaxell@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.180 mail-lb0-f180.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.180] ([209.85.217.180:38601] helo=mail-lb0-f180.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A7/18-08895-DC2A8E45 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 10:22:54 -0500 Received: by lbiz11 with SMTP id z11so11446453lbi.5 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 07:22:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=v2J8gcqqlb2mg6HvNNrhk3k1brGNRUKszh+hAnWk3pI=; b=INAaSdT//pPNSWwiilpO3lc1gSq3fidWpdldvEfr6Ge8fTJu5oRZU/c9SlZR5e3tV5 5BtbVxt42G4TY+79XrucxcEwXX89Aph79/Lf1O7bUKvSuETRd+FZJiRk87zaYuRenXxn gMk8PDwFbXuUaVVKvWCzwY0cZjFQfZH0xmNMjp7bn6OhSUSLXVfbB4l2LwpVROnv/6ov A3IISGTap/uveEwAGGDe2K74k84TQwdyEKzyfNwe9MLmudWAw+r9975JLtdWeolSjokf omn3fXh1IFUfbyFK8AbRHkP+hUzKRTPeEq5fleBaw6C/+YIxS9ENnv7JvNhE3wlATnT9 sP5w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.110.231 with SMTP id id7mr2503103lbb.28.1424532170913; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 07:22:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.43.9 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 07:22:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <011801d04a07$83ab1c00$8b015400$@php.net> <7a5d96b34b98ec1f3ee17be7fa6a1e81@mail.gmail.com> <2CBDEB67-3DE3-437D-9AF3-0E6A92027244@zend.com> <4cc0c81c7199a452534bb8edcdb19914@mail.gmail.com> <54E589F6.9030002@garfieldtech.com> <54E66569.8000709@garfieldtech.com> <012001d04d46$271dac90$755905b0$@tutteli.ch> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 10:22:50 -0500 Message-ID: To: Zeev Suraski Cc: Larry Garfield , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Reviving scalar type hints From: ircmaxell@gmail.com (Anthony Ferrara) Zeev, > Anthony, > > Following Adam's analysis of the timeline, taking the more 'strict' (no pun > intended!) interpretation of the timeline RFC, we still have until tomorrow > to start the discussion and still target it for 7.0, no? Given the > importance of this topic, I'd go for the more lax interpretation that allows > for votes to begin by March 15, giving us all a bit more time to discuss. I > don't think any of us, on any camp, wants to wait for 2016 for this. > > Thoughts? I'm fine with that. My interpretation was that the feature freeze would happen on March 15 (that afterwards no new RFCs would be accepted). I made the decision to target 7.next/8 based on the assumption that the competing RFC would not be able to fairly target 7.0. If you are saying that's not the issue, then I'll happily re-target this RFC for 7.0 again. I just didn't want to be seen as (or actually do) pushing based on a timing advantage that your proposal couldn't possibly meet. So if you're fine with it (which it seems you are), I'll re-target the RFC now. Thanks Anthony