Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83374
Return-Path: <francois@php.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 66230 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2015 02:35:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 21 Feb 2015 02:35:39 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=francois@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=francois@php.net; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 212.27.42.2 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: francois@php.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.27.42.2 smtp2-g21.free.fr  
Received: from [212.27.42.2] ([212.27.42.2:25689] helo=smtp2-g21.free.fr)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 67/A3-45394-BFEE7E45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 21:35:39 -0500
Received: from moorea (unknown [82.240.16.115])
	by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54304B010F;
	Sat, 21 Feb 2015 03:35:29 +0100 (CET)
Reply-To: <francois@php.net>
To: "'Larry Garfield'" <larry@garfieldtech.com>,
	<internals@lists.php.net>
References: <CAESVnVoJW3EQu254kztSG_1QjJjnqLJkxHOEL+gofwpJC7D40A@mail.gmail.com>	<54E7822F.4070307@fischer.name> <CAEZPtU5uJkYx-fCDjBdGPaSjNtuaNt1ao-o5dkDCtJxO3_DMfQ@mail.gmail.com> <54E7C372.2010700@garfieldtech.com>
In-Reply-To: <54E7C372.2010700@garfieldtech.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 03:35:30 +0100
Message-ID: <059901d04d7f$10a8fd00$31faf700$@php.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIyuUwUVFIdYJq88tPJ7BNGL6d/pQFphJKyAbiufG0BpCInmZwPUJ+Q
Content-Language: fr
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150220-1, 20/02/2015), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Reserve EVEN MORE types for PHP7
From: francois@php.net (=?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?=)

Hi Larry,

That's OK. Let's remove 'resource'.

Anyway, I already explained why, IMO,  the approach of reserving =
keywords is flawed from the beginning. I'll explain again and propose an =
alternative in the upcoming STH RFC.

Once we have a solution for the underlying issue with a planned =
solution, we can start reserve names for the interim period if it is =
still needed.

Regards

Fran=C3=A7ois