Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83339 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 87759 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2015 18:48:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Feb 2015 18:48:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=markus@fischer.name; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=markus@fischer.name; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fischer.name from 62.179.121.39 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: markus@fischer.name X-Host-Fingerprint: 62.179.121.39 fep19.mx.upcmail.net Solaris 10 (beta) Received: from [62.179.121.39] ([62.179.121.39:44682] helo=fep19.mx.upcmail.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 90/1C-14173-77187E45 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:48:24 -0500 Received: from edge02.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.237]) by viefep19-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.05.05 201-2260-151-110-20120111) with ESMTP id <20150220184818.XFRZ17476.viefep19-int.chello.at@edge02.upcmail.net> for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:48:18 +0100 Received: from mail02.home ([213.47.1.174]) by edge02.upcmail.net with edge id uioJ1p0163lFLNl01ioJri; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:48:18 +0100 X-SourceIP: 213.47.1.174 Received: from mail02.home ([192.168.1.14] helo=[IPv6:::1]) by mail02.home with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YOscb-00043N-Ik for internals@lists.php.net; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:48:18 +0100 Message-ID: <54E78171.4090403@fischer.name> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:48:17 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "scanner01.home", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 20.02.15 18:16, Dan Ackroyd wrote: > On 20 February 2015 at 12:54, Niklas Keller wrote: >> Hi internals, >> >> It would really make sense to vote on this RFC after there has been a >> vote on https://wiki.php.net/rfc/context_sensitive_lexer. > > That is an understatement: > https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/blob/master/lib/Doctrine/ORM/Query/Expr.php#L443 > > I don't think changing the language in a way that breaks Doctrine > would be feasible. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Discussion] In Operator From: markus@fischer.name (Markus Fischer) On 20.02.15 18:16, Dan Ackroyd wrote: > On 20 February 2015 at 12:54, Niklas Keller wrote: >> Hi internals, >> >> It would really make sense to vote on this RFC after there has been a >> vote on https://wiki.php.net/rfc/context_sensitive_lexer. > > That is an understatement: > https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/blob/master/lib/Doctrine/ORM/Query/Expr.php#L443 > > I don't think changing the language in a way that breaks Doctrine > would be feasible. I second this. I didn't immediately reply when I read this restriction regarding methods but it should have been obvious. IMHO this is an absolute no-go; and the contex_sensitive_lexer sounds reasonable but has it's own problematic areas. - Markus