Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83313 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29391 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2015 15:48:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Feb 2015 15:48:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cryptocompress@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cryptocompress@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.177 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cryptocompress@googlemail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.177 mail-we0-f177.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.177] ([74.125.82.177:42788] helo=mail-we0-f177.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5D/42-14173-F5757E45 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:48:48 -0500 Received: by wesw62 with SMTP id w62so6303761wes.9 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 07:48:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8XeRqfbK+oGbG8TAfNf+QsLew8kgCn6+wwxvCbqm7Qc=; b=Q6qlm76zc6Tjwv+VC9KEdzJmNi8xXzWhGTaHQ64r9CYu/jGnnXeaKc9U8oJbLxMoao 9ZsEehDCksZP5xomaCYtkzZroi1ItTsBSZ6mE2yvcXT7z1FaRpMxC2F/R9Z8bbc7b0iC raCfEPmhwPc5MjeM2UM5JNjBNDwV5slSIkKS2qi8D9eVZRdbKel88pwsjAZ6p+t6tS/J 9FKNKkfrWyBTWWCgOT9JfS7FOMTVn7C08VG0+II5DvdMtvZ9O7DbNc7CEf0cZequAtRi U5kWy6mj22hSTLRc3fIc3kdVFHYvJLAHHc/POWzRaBBZOa9EapeZwpOtverxF/UlLQjb PGGQ== X-Received: by 10.194.2.43 with SMTP id 11mr20417474wjr.104.1424447325003; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 07:48:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.115] (mnch-5d858289.pool.mediaWays.net. [93.133.130.137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pp10sm42590619wjc.31.2015.02.20.07.48.43 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 07:48:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54E7575A.5010800@googlemail.com> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:48:42 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP Developers Mailing List References: <54E5F77D.9090406@fischer.name> <54E6F48A.9040906@fischer.name> <54E72FE7.9030803@googlemail.com> <54E7312D.9090404@googlemail.com> <54E73E70.5020403@googlemail.com> <54E74ADF.9040608@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Expectations From: cryptocompress@googlemail.com (Crypto Compress) To be harsh: All comments in favour of throwing exceptions here, substantiate theirs needs with dead, never reached and potentially buggy code. The *changed code flow in production* is the big pitfall of this RFC and an absolute no-go. I like zero-cost assertions but throwing exceptions is wrong. my 2 cents > ...exceptions are not used by default... Can't find this point in RFC.