Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83239
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.223.172 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAyV7nHHBxSPemoF0Gj+ridov99WFLMh-+nxDwBY5ikJwV0OUg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAyV7nHHBxSPemoF0Gj+ridov99WFLMh-+nxDwBY5ikJwV0OUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 21:40:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CADR=R-iBDWCAeaRh53txfKvvL4ccKA9Fr8Bg68wt0NEHkJefbQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com>, francois@php.net
Cc: Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fefc24a9792050f76f3e1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Using Other Channels (was Scalar Type Declarations v0.5)
From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stas Malyshev)

--001a113fefc24a9792050f76f3e1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi!

> So rather than go for the 70-75% consensus that we **know** we have,

How we magically know that? We have the (unfinished) vote, which has a
tiny bit over 66% for the proposal. Where 75% comes from?

> I created a forked RFC. You can keep her as lead all you want, that
> doesn't mean I can't move forward with my RFC.

I think it would really be better to have a lot less "us vs them" and a
bit more cooperative spirit here.

> That's fine. Let's let the votes decide rather than relying on
strongarming.

And cooperation means a bit more than "we've got 66% so we don't care
about anything else".

> Saying a problem doesn't exist doesn't make it go away.

Except if it really doesn't exist, so there's nothing to go away :)

-- 
Stas Malyshev
smalyshev@gmail.com

--001a113fefc24a9792050f76f3e1--